Selasa, 31 Maret 2009

Coppola, Redford, Evan Rachel Wood highlight 52nd S.F. Film Festival

MPAA draws curtain on movie production and marketing budgets data

Reversing a longstanding practice, the Motion Picture Association of America won't disclose the average amount of money that studios spent on making and marketing movies last year.

For years, the MPAA has included detailed statistics and analysis showing average theatrical costs for its members and affiliates, as well as how much money the studios annually spent advertising their movies. 

But the data, which was closely watched in Hollywood and in the media, was conspicuously absent from the group's Theatrical Market Statistics report for 2008, which was released today.

Grilled about the matter during a press conference at the annual ShoWest trade show in Las Vegas, MPAA Chairman and CEO Dan Glickman said the increasingly complex nature of film financing and distribution made it difficult to obtain reliable data.

"Year-to-year average costs comparisons are really useless and misleading,'' he said. "I'm not sure what these numbers mean anymore."

Nonetheless, Glickman's comments fueled speculation that the reversal came about as a result of pressure from his studio bosses, who are never eager to cast a spotlight on how much they spend, particularly during a time of recession and layoffs.

The unusual decision comes at a time when Glickman's performance has come under greater scrutiny. His contract was recently extended only for one year. Some observers said the studios do not think the MPAA has been effective, especially by being unable to lobby successfully for tax breaks for Hollywood in the recent federal stimulus package.

The tax provisionwhich would have provided the same tax benefits to Hollywood that accrue to other US industries that keep jobs in America -  faced opposition from some in Congress who portrayed it as a bailout to Hollywood.

Glickman said the speculation was wrong. "This is not about us trying to protect ourselves on the lobbying side,'' he said. "There's nothing conspiratorial about this." 

The MPAA did not attempt to compile the data this year but may do so in subsequent years if it comes up with a better way of tabulating average film costs, Glickman said.

He and other film industry officials touted how well the industry has held up in the face of an historic recession. Global box office revenue reached an all-time high of $28.1 billion in 2008, up 7% from 2007, led by such hit as "Dark Knight" "Iron Man" and "Indiana Jones & the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull." International markets continued to drive growth, accounting for 65% of box office receipts.

"All in all the cinema industry is doing remarkably well during very difficult times,'' said John Fithian, president and ceo of the National Association of Theater Owners during speech at ShoWest.

Still, the industry experienced a slight decline in admissions last year, with attendance at North American Theaters falling 2.6% to 1.4 billion in 2008, according to the MPAA report.  Higher box office revenues was due to higher ticket prices.

In other 2008 statistics: the average national ticket price rose to $7.18, up from $6.88. The overall number of films released in the U.S. rose to 606, up from 584 in 2007.

--Richard Verrier

 

 

.


'Angel' fans mourn the passing of Andy Hallett

How sad to read of the death of Andy Hallett.

Hallett, who livened up the cult drama "Angel" for four seasons as a demon named Lorne, died of heart failure March 29, his agent told EOnline.com.

Hallett was 33 and had struggled with heart disease for five years, according to the site.

"Angel" was a show that had trouble finding its way during its first couple of seasons. But the WB drama, which was created by Joss Whedon and David Greenwalt, hit pay dirt when the brooding vampire Angel (Dvaid Boreanaz) and his friends found their way to Caritas, the karaoke bar run by Krevlornswath of the Deathwok Clan.

Lorne Lorne, for short. (He also went by "The Host," a reference to his emcee duties at Caritas).

Other actors might have been hampered by having to work under a thick layer of green makeup, but not Hallett, whose vivacity and wit shone through no matter what sort of apocalyptic crisis the "Angel" crew was facing.

Sure, "Angel" was a cult drama (and ultimately a very complex and compelling one) about a vampire who was constantly battling bad guys, but the comedic episodes set in Lorne's home dimension of Pylea were among the show's high points. But those broadly comedic shows were the exception, not the rule. "Angel" could be a dark show -- even Lorne had his dark moments -- but the presence of the tart-tongued demon ensured that it wasn't a total gloom-fest. It was often a quite witty gloom-fest, thank you.  

It's very hard to believe that Hallett was so young; Lorne was such an ageless character. Lorne was comic relief, to be sure, but he was also an old soul, one who'd seen it all and found endless ways to quip about it. Thanks to Hallett's presence, energy and deft timing, he made Lorne one of the best things about "Angel."

Fans have been sharing their thoughts about the actor, who focused on his music career after "Angel" ended its run five years ago, on various online forums.

"Andy was a beautiful, sweet man and had so much talent. The world is a duller place without him," a fan named Helygen said on Whedonesque.com, a leading Whedon fan site. "I had the pleasure of meeting him many times, and he was always so warm and friendly, even when he was clearly unwell. My thoughts are with his family and friends, as they try to come to terms with the huge hole in their world."

Some links (share more in the comment area if you know of any other Hallett stories):

Arlo J. Wiley notes that Lorne was Hallett's first TV role, yet he made it look easy. Thanks to Wiley for providing the link to the clip of Lorne performing "Lady Marmalade." Wikipedia entries on Lorne and on Hallett.An L.A. Times story on Hallett's death. Many fans weighed in with thoughts and remembrances in the comment area of E!Online's Watch With Kristin piece. English broadcaster Keith Topping posted a remembrance of Hallett.


Coppola, Redford, Evan Rachel Wood highlight 52nd S.F. Film Festival
Honorees, opening- and closing-night screenings, celeb appearances and other info were announced at the San Francisco International Film Festival news conference Tuesday in S.F.
MUSIC-ITALY: Nurturing Opera
AMEGLIO, Italy, Mar 31 (IPS)Fabrizio tells a young woman, Eriko, that it is very cold outside, while logs crackle in the fireplace and the sun sets behind the mountains, adorned with last night’s snowfall. It is all true, but they are acting, rehearsing a famous scene from the opera La Bohème, by Giacomo Puccini.

Senin, 30 Maret 2009

Icahn fires back at Lions Gate over tender offer remarks

Icahn fires back at Lions Gate over tender offer remarks

In what's fast becoming an all-out P.R. battle, billionaire Carl Icahn struck back today at Lions Gate Entertainment's cautionary words last week to investors who may be considering tendering their bonds to the activist shareholder.

Icahn, who owns 14.5% of the studio's equity and has offered to buy up its convertible debt, questioned in a regulatory filing Monday whether Lions Gate's current liquidity position would be "sufficient enough" to meet its obligations if its revolving credit facility fell into default triggered by a change of control at the company.

If a shareholder's stake exceeds 20%, Lions Gate might have to immediately repay any amount it has drawn on its $340 million "revolver" as well as obligations under its $325 million in notes. "If this occurred, the company would face either a refinancing or a restructuring," Icahn suggests in the filing with the Secvurities and Exchange Commission. And, given the depressed credit markets, Icahn notes, "One is left to speculate how the company would meet this demand without restructuring?"

It's unclear whether Icahn is signaling his intention to continue upping his stake to more than 20%, in which case he would be the one triggering the default. Lions Gate's largest shareholder ,Mark Rachesky, who was Icahn's former investment chief, has recently increased his holding but so far has stopped just short of 20%.

Icahn goes on to say that if Lions Gate is forced to restructure, he believes much of the company's equity would end up being owned by the debt holder and that eventually the company's library assets would provide noteholders "full recovery value if managed properly."

Icahn also questioned Lions Gate's claim that it did not tap the revolver to pay for its $255 million all- cash acquisition of TV Guide Network when the company's filings showed that as of December 31, 2008, it only had $131 million of cash on hand. "Where did it get the extra cash?," Icahn asks.

Lions Gate had no comment.

-- Claudia Eller


'Cupid' gets another shot at love

You can’t say “Cupid” (9 p.m. Central Tuesday, ABC; two and a half stars) hasn’t gotten a fair shot from the gods of television.

Rob Thomas, who later went on to create the cult detective drama “Veronica Mars,” first brought “Cupid” to the small screen 11 years ago. The original series, which was shot in Chicago and starred Jeremy Piven as a man who either was Cupid or thought he was that charming rogue of a god, lasted all of one season.

Cupid ABC decided to give Thomas and “Cupid” another chance, and though new star Bobby Cannavale is entertaining as the title character, it’s not entirely clear why ABC thought this slight premise was worth another go-round.

This feather-light romantic comedy certainly couldn't be mistaken for anything on another network. Just as CBS has cemented its reputation as the go-to source for dark, shadowy crime dramas, where dank basements, rain-slicked streets and Gothic color schemes are the norm, ABC shows (not counting that drama with the smoke monster) are resolutely upbeat and brightly lit.

Seriously. It's as if there was a sale at the lighting store and ABC grabbed every bulb in stock, lest a single corner of any of its shows remain in shadow. 

Even the mid-season show "Castle," ABC's attempt at a detective procedural, is sunny and funny (at least that would appear to be the goal). Few gloomy outlooks or sour purveyors of sarcasm are allowed on the alphabet network, unless, of course, they sport McDreamy-style poufy hair or Sawyer's bewitching dimples.

The problem is, though this good-natured show doesn't lack for energy, “Cupid” is a little bland and formulaic. And it doesn’t help that, like so many shows of late, it features an irrepressible and charming male lead who is constantly hemmed in by an uptight and fairly humorless woman. Is it not possible for a woman on a broadcast network show to be a lovable rogue? Even a likable rogue?

Still, the slenderness of “Cupid’s” premise and characters might not matter if there were more sparks of love-hate chemistry in the mix. Alas, this is a romantic comedy without an abundance of sparky romance, at least between the show’s lead characters.

Sarah Paulson plays Dr. Claire McCrae, a psychiatrist who sees the problems of “Trevor Pierce” (that’s Cupid’s  earthly pseudonym) as a mental malady. In her professional opinion, his goalâ€"which involves uniting 100 couples in true love and thus regaining admission to Mt. Olympusâ€"is a delusion, one most likely rooted in a psychic trauma, one that needs to be properly excavated and analyzed.

Not only is Pierce’s mission problematic, in her view, she finds his view of love as a passionate, intemperate and glee-inducing phenomenon almost dangerous. McCrae made her name writing self-help books full of sensible and practical relationship advice, and as far as she’s concerned, Pierce’s attempts to convince jaded New Yorkers of the irrational power of romance is bound to come to grief.

"Maybe you two would be better served by altering your expectations," she primly says to Pierce about his first "client," a lovelorn musician.

Yikes. Who would you rather have as your wingman? Cupid or Dr. Buzzkill?

Though Cannavale is a warm and instantly likable presence, Paulson may be a bit too stiff to make McCrae likable. Or maybe McCrae is just not that interesting of a character.

Still, it wouldn’t do to give up on “Cupid” after only one episode, which is all ABC provided for review. The pilot, which is well-paced and breezy, has to set up Pierce and McCrae’s relationship as well as introduce the question of whether this “god” is insane or not. Perhaps once those plot mechanics are more or less out of the way, love will bloom, or at least affection for these characters.

Or, if we see the same head-versus-heart debate every week, “Cupid” could end up being a one-season wonder. Again.

Photo: Paulson, Cannavale, Rick Gomez and Camille Guaty in "Cupid."


Chetan Tierra conquers Prokofiev
Young area pianists shows his stuff with Santa Cruz Symphony
Spinal Tap Hits The Road Unwigged And Unplugged

25 years after their musical mockumentary This Is Spinal Tap, Christopher Guest, Harry Shearer and Michael McKean are back… not as Nigel, Derek and David, but as themselves. They'll be playing songs from Spinal Tap and A Mighty Wind on their 30-city tour.


Minggu, 29 Maret 2009

Memories of 'ER'
When it airs its final hours this week, 'ER' may not be going out on top — but it is definitely worth remembering.
Video Game Conference Looks To Future

The future of the video game was on display at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco. Ricardo Torres, editor-in-chief of GameSpot.com, notes that a start-up company called OnLive plans to stream high-quality games directly to your TV.


Sabtu, 28 Maret 2009

Former AOL chief to join News Corp.

Former AOL chief to join News Corp.

Johnmiller320_3 Former America Online Chief Executive Jonathan Miller is expected to join News Corp. in the newly-created position overseeing digital strategy, according to a person familiar with the situation.

Miller is a well known figure in digital media, whose name was mentioned in conjunction with the top job at Yahoo. It would be the start of a major reorganization of the News Corp. digital division. It's unclear how this would affect Peter Levinsohn, who currently oversees Fox Interactive Media, which includes MySpace.

Levinsohn is well regarded by New Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch and other senior executives at the company, and sources say there could potentially be another role for him inside the company.

Miller stepped down as head of AOL in 2006, and founded the investment firm Velocity Capital. Last year, he was reportedly involved in trying to secure financing to make a bid for Yahoo at $20 to $22 a share, or $28 billion to $30 billion.

Miller has established himself as a hot hand on the Internet. He made his mark in e-commerce at Barry Diller's media conglomerate, then as chairman and chief executive of AOL, from which he was ousted in November 2006. He has detractors, particularly inside Time Warner, but gets plaudits from analysts and colleagues who say he is one of the industry's foremost strategic thinkers.

Herb Scannell, CEO of Internet television start-up Next New Networks and former vice-chairman of MTV Networks, calls Miller "one of the smartest guys I have come across in the media world."

-- Dawn Chmielewski and Claudia Eller

Photo of Miller by


When a Kennedy set out to conquer Hollywood
During his five-year sojourn in Tinseltown, Joseph P. Kennedy took advantage of the chaos created by the sound revolution, anticipated the 1929 market crash and brought a bank president's acumen to the business of making films. Betty Lasky told author Cari Beauchamp he was 'the first and only outsider to fleece Hollywood.'

Jumat, 27 Maret 2009

Lions Gate to slash another 8% of workforce

Lions Gate to slash another 8% of workforce

Feltheimer3Nearly five months after slashing 41 jobs, Lions Gate Entertainment is eliminating another 45 positions, or about 8% of its 550-person workforce. Of that total, 27 people will be laid off, another 10 will become independent contractors in consulting jobs and production deals, and eight will be open positions not filled. The pink slips are being handed out today at the Santa Monica-based movie and television studio, which produces the "Saw" and Tyler Perry films and "Mad Men" and "Weeds" cable series.

The combination of the earlier cuts in November and this second round will shave between $15 million to $20 million off Lions Gate's $135 million-a-year overhead.

Activist shareholder Carl Icahn, who owns 14.5% of Lions Gate stock and is threatening to launch a proxy war against the company, has been pushing management to slash what he views as "excessive" overhead costs at the company.

However, even before Icahn became publicly vocal with that and other gripes he has with management, Lions Gate chief executive Jon Feltheimer (pictured) and vice chairman Michael Burns began taking measures to reduce costs at the studio amid fallout from the tough economy and volatility of its movie and DVD business. Last summer, they enacted a hiring freeze, followed by cuts in the fall.

It was then that Icahn began upping his stake in the studio, buying up the depressed stock on the cheap. Icahn's latest move was to tender an offer for all of the company's public debt. It's unclear at this point just how many takers the corporate raider will have, though Lions Gate's largest debt holder, John Kornitzer, has gone on record to say he refuses to sell Icahn a single bond and wishes he would "just go crawl under a rock."

However, that's a longshot. Even Lions Gate is preparing for the worst, having armed itself with a $2 million defense team of top-notch lawyers, bankers and proxy solicitation and  public relations firms.

Despite the inevitable distraction, management is trying to stay focused on its business. After suffering through two bad quarters of weak movie performances, the studio has regained its footing at the box office with the recent hit "Tyler Perry's Madea Goes To Jail" and before that the solid performer "My Bloody Valentine 3-D."

We'll see what happens this weekend when the studio's PG-13 horror thriller "The Haunting in Connecticut" opens in over 2,000 theaters.

Any way you look at it, these are scary times for Lions Gate.

--Claudia Eller

Photo credit: Bloomberg News


Return of the beauty queen
The clocks on the creamy walls at Intercontinental Hotel strike 2pm, as I hastily squeeze myself past guests. It is now or never for an interview with the Paris-based model Agnes Amondyi Alando-Hoffer.
With Symphony Silicon Valley, violinist Ju-Young Baek goes straight to the heart of Brahms
Having flown in from Seoul to perform with the orchestra at the California Theatre, Ju-Young Baek gave an incredible rendition of the daunting Brahms Violin Concerto.
'Wild Blessings': Wendell Berry's Passions, Reframed

The Actor's Theatre of Louisville puts the agrarian philosopher's environmental poetry onstage with Wild Blessings: A Celebration Of Wendell Berry, premiering at the Humana Festival.


Kamis, 26 Maret 2009

L.A. film permit rules anger location managers

Talk about mixed messages.

Los Angeles City Council voted Wednesday to take a series of steps aimed at helping the film and TV industry. They pledged to reduce parking costs and install electrical utility outlets in frequently used locations to eliminate the need for generators. And they agreed to at least explore idea of  offering a business tax break for productions that shoot in the city, dovetailing recent decision by the state Legislature to adopt film tax credits.

The incentives were recommended in a recent report requested by Council President Eric Garcetti after the ABC television show "Ugly Betty" moved its production from LA to New York last summer.

"We need to do what we can to keep production where it belongsin the entertainment capital of the world,'' Garcetti said in a statement.

But even as Garcetti touted the vote in a press release, location managers and others in the industry were fuming about city plans to impose a raft of new restrictions on film permitting. The proposed rules are aimed at balancing the needs of filmmakers with the concerns of residents, who've complained loudly in recent years about excessive filming in their neighborhoods and a lack of enforcement of film permits.

But critics say the proposed rules only make filming in the city less attractive. For example, a filmmaker would have to wait 5 days before he could close a street for a film shoot. FilmL.A., Inc., the nonprofit group that coordinates film permits, typically requires 72 hours notice, but makes exceptions depending on where the shoot is occuring, and the needs of filmmakers.

"There is too much rigidity here for us to be able to get our jobs done,'' said Ed Duffy, business agent for Teamsters Local 399, which represents location managers, casting directors and studio drivers. "Filming is not an exact science. We do things in a very rapid fashion and things change constantly for us."

Location managers will take their concerns to City Hall on Tuesday, when the City Council will discuss the propsed new rules.  Expect a large turnout.

-Richard Verrier


Botswana is the real star of HBO’s ‘No. 1 Ladies’

The opening moments of “The No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency” (7 p.m. Central Sunday, HBO, two stars) contains some of the most gorgeous imagery you’re likely to see on television this year. As the camera swoops over an African landscape, animals roam and flock; majestic serenity pervades the scene. Those opening minutes certainly made me dream of taking a vacation in Botswana.

 
What follows is a faithful adaptation of the debut novel in Alexander McCall Smith’s series of popular novels about the first female private detective in Botswana.


But perhaps the adaptation is too faithful. What comes across as charmingly spare on the page frequently ends up lacking complexity on the screen. And if you’ve read the novel, the first of the six-part “Ladies” TV project will contain few surprises. It can actually be quite slow going at times.


On other networks, there are examples of terrific performers elevating what could have been prosaic fare. In the NBC show’s early going, Damien Lewis made “Life” watchable even when the plots were somewhat formulaic. And Ian McShane’s forceful charisma has given the new NBC drama “Kings” more of an impact than it would otherwise probably have.


Unfortunately, “Ladies” star Jill Scott lacks that kind of presence.


Best known as an R&B singer, Scott is competent and certainly gives her all to the role of Precious Ramotswe, a plucky and resourceful detective whose observational skills and knowledge of human nature help her crack cases.


But there’s very little subtext in Scott’s performance. Given that the books from which the TV show are derived are so slight to begin with, this show is often less than the sum of its parts.


Still, the African landscape and the supporting performers are all draws. In particular, the excellent Lucian Msamati gives nervous vulnerability to J.L.B. Matekoni, the owner of a local car repair shop and Ramotswe’s eventual suitor. Desmond Dube brings light comic relief as the owner of a hair salon next to Ramotswe’s office. And as the detective agency’s high-strung secretary, Anika Noni Rose gets maximum comedic mileage out of her role.


As befits a project that was directed by Oscar winner Anthony Minghella and produced in part by Oscar winner Sydney Pollack (both of whom died last  year), the pilot episode of “Ladies” gets the details right and looks quite handsome.


'American Idol': Adam Lambert is 'like Sanjaya -- with talent'
Adam Lambert became a lightning rod last week for the "American Idol" Readers Judges Panel. After he delivered an overwrought version of "Ring of Fire," our horrified arbiters used words like "creepy" and "a disaster" to describe the performance.
'Monsters Vs. Aliens': When 3-D Attacks

A meteor transforms a valley girl into a giantess — and kick-starts her career as a world-saving monster once aliens invade. DreamWorks' animated frolic features the voices of Seth Rogen and Reese Witherspoon.


Rabu, 25 Maret 2009

The Star Report: Woz allowed to stay on 'Dancing With the Stars'
Nerdy ballroom dance enthusiasts seem to be taking time out from their Twittering to get behind valley homie Steve "Twinkle Toes" Wozniak. Or maybe it was the DWTS devotees who often support the underdogs they, like blogger Ron Kitagawa, feel are unfairly savaged by the judges.

  View slide show: The Woz on DWTS
'Three Stooges' To Get Hollywood Treatment

The Hollywood Reporter says that a remake of the Three Stooges is on the way. The surprising thing is the casting: The stooges will be played by Jim Carrey, Sean Penn and Benicio Del Toro.


CULTURE-ETHIOPIA: Old Master Challenges Film-makers to Look Within
ADDIS ABABA, Mar 25 (IPS)Haile Gerima's film "Teza" may only have come to the world's attention when it won Africa’s highest prize in Ouagadougou on Mar. 7, but it has been a sensation in his native Ethiopia since it premiered in Addis Ababa at the start of the year.

Selasa, 24 Maret 2009

Zac Efron drops out of 'Footloose' remake
Zac Efron has dropped out of his role in a remake of "Footloose." Paramount Pictures says the "High School Musical" heartthrob is no longer attached to the upcoming film.
The Vietnam War, Through Eddie Adams' Lens

Adams photographed 13 wars, and made some of the most iconic images of the Vietnam War. But the Pulitzer Prize he won for one photograph left him conflicted for the rest of his life.


TRADE-TANZANIA: Crafts Business Disproves Myths About Disability
IRINGA, Tanzania, Mar 24 (IPS)After Joel Haule developed a crippling childhood disease that left him wheelchair-bound, his parents began calling him ‘‘Matatizo’’, the Kiswahili word for ‘‘problems’’.

Senin, 23 Maret 2009

Heralded digital music chief at EMI out after only 11 months

Douglasmerrill

EMI Music said its head of digital music, Douglas Merrill, was leaving the company he joined less than a year ago, and his business unit would be integrated into the label's operations.

The former Google chief information officer's decision to join EMI in April was heralded as a major coup for the music label. In interviews, Merrill talked excitedly about the company's embrace of digital technology and its transformation to a services company that could profit from small bands, as well as giants like the band Coldplay.

Merrill could not be reached Monday for comment.Ctlogosmall

In announcing Merrill's departure, EMI Music Chief Executive Elio Leoni-Sceti said that digital music sales now account for 20% of the company's revenue and that the business would no longer be run as a stand-alone operation.

Leoni-Sceti announced that the company had promoted Cory Ondrejka to the newly created position of executive vice president of digital marketing. Ondrejka joined EMI in June from Second Live. The company's CEO described him as "a highly talented executive with a passion for music and a unique technology-based skill set."

-- Dawn C. Chmielewski

Photo: Google


Berkeley Rep announces ambitious 2009-10 season
Three hotly anticipated world premieres will headline the fall season at the ever-adventurous Berkeley Rep, including probing new plays about race and culture by Naomi Iizuka and Lisa Kron, a musical valentine based on the songs of Matthew Sweet and a West Coast premiere from Tony Kushner.
Video Game Grad Programs Open Up The Industry

By focusing on games as a medium for artistic experimentation and collaboration, graduate programs in video game design are bringing change to an industry once known for its monoculture.


Minggu, 22 Maret 2009

Pension fund of performer's union socked by stock market

Pension fund of performer's union socked by stock market

Chalk up another example of Wall Street hitting Hollywood.

The American Federation of Television and Radio Artists said Saturday that the value of its pension fund fell 23% last year to $1.54 billion as a result the stock market slide. The losses have forced the union to make adjustments to its retirement plan.

In a decision that is likely to be deeply unpopular among the 77,000 members, trustees of AFTRA's health and retirement fund voted to change the way pension benefits are calculated and increase the minimum annual earnings threshold needed to earn a pension credit to $15,000 from $7,500.

The upshot is that fewer members will qualify for the unions' pension plan because they won't meet the earnings threshold. AFTRA officials wouldn't say how many members would be affected, but said the change was necessary to secure the soundness of its retirement plan in a tough economic environment.

"The higher earnings threshold is a painful but overdue step that the Trustees believe will also help our retirement plan to weather what most experts agree will be a difficult economic environment for the next few years,''  AFTRA President Roberta Reardon said in a statement. "The AFTRA plan has followed a smart, stable and diversified strategy. But like every other pension plan in the country ... our plan has felt the impact of the current economic turmoil."

--Richard Verrier


'Grease' returns to S.F. stage, with a cast member chosen 'American Idol'-style
Since America has been hopelessly devoted to reality TV talent-competitions in the tsunami-sized wake of 'American Idol,' wily producers wasted no time trotting out 'Grease: You're the One That I Want.' This NBC TV series let viewers vote for their favorites, as legions of peppy hopefuls vied for the lead roles in the Broadway revival. Now a touring version is on the road.
FILM-US: Latino Fest in the Fray of Pop Culture's Lucha Libre
SAN DIEGO, California, Mar 22 (IPS)The San Diego Latino Film Festival is perhaps the biggest little film festival most people outside of Southern California have never heard of.

Sabtu, 21 Maret 2009

See you on the other side: 'Battlestar Galactica's' series finale, 'Daybreak'

Bsglogo The following post discusses "Daybreak," the final episode of "Battlestar Galactica."

First up, there's an interview with executive producer Ronald D. Moore. There's also material from a discussion of the finale that occurred on Monday, after the last episode was screened for the press. Moore, executive producer David Eick and stars Mary McDonnell and Edward James Olmos answered some questions after that screening.

There are also a few remarks from an interview I did with McDonnell after the show was the subject of a panel discussion at the United Nations.

The final part is my thoughts on the finale. If you even get that far, you get a special prize: My eternal esteem.

For more reviews, interviews and "Battlestar" info, keep visiting Galactica Sitrep, which will be posting links about the finale continuously. On Friday, the site posted Moore's farewell note to fans.

There's more info on this site about "Battlestar Galactica":

Look here for a writeup of a recent panel discussion about the show at the United Nations (you can view the entire panel, or sections of it, via RealAudio by going here). Look here for more information about "The Plan," the upcoming "Battlestar" TV movie, and for more information on "Caprica," the "Battlestar" prequel series that debuts in 2010.  Look here for my thoughts on the March 13 episode, "Daybreak, Part 1," the first third of the finale. Look here for a discussion of "Islanded in a Stream of Stars," the March 6 episode. Look here for an interview with Michael Taylor, the writer of "Islanded in a Stream of Stars." "Battlestar Galactica" will be the subject of a panel discussion at the United Nations. For more on that, look here. Look herefor an interview with Bradley Thompson and David Weddle regarding"Someone to Watch Over Me," the Feb. 27 episode of "BattlestarGalactica.""Battlestar" fans should be sure to keep an eye on "CSI." At leasttwo people associated with the Sci Fi show will make appearances in anupcoming episode of the CBS drama. For more on that, look here. Look here for an interview with Jane Espenson regarding "Deadlock," the Feb. 20 episode of "Battlestar Galactica." Look here for an interview with Ryan Mottesheard and Espenson regarding "No Exit," the Feb. 13 episode.  Look herefor an interview with Michael Angeli, the writer of "Blood on theScales," the Feb. 6 episode. Look here for an interview with Mark Verheiden, the writer of "The Oath," the Jan. 30 episode. 
Look herefor an interview with executive producer Ronald D. Moore, who wrote anddirected "A Disquiet Follows My Soul," which aired Jan. 23.  Look here for interviews with Moore and with the writers and the director of "Sometimes a Great Notion," which aired Jan. 16.

Can you believe it's really over? I can't either. Before accepting that fact, let's talk and think and write about the finale way too much. Here goes...

Part 1: The interview with Moore

One bit that is more useful, I think, summarized in bullet points: Information on the Season 4.5 DVDs.

Rosdama Three episodes from Season 4.5 will have longer cuts on DVD (and Moore doesn't know when the DVD will be coming out, by the way):

The DVD version of "A Disquiet Follows My Soul" will be about 10 minutes longer. The DVD version of "Islanded in a Stream of Stars" will be about 15-20 minutes longer.The DVD version of "Daybreak," the series finale, will be about 15-20 minutes longer.

And now here's the interview. In this section, I combined two different interviews I did with Moore, on March 16 and March 20.

MR: I think one thing that threw me about the finale was that it was hopeful.

RDM: [laughs] There were a fair number of people that were prepared for the most nihilistic [finale ever].

MR: "You're going to kill them all, aren't you!?"


RDM: I know.

MR: It's the ultimate sucker punch of "Battlestar Galactica" -- that it ends on a hopeful note.

RDM: Yeah, it's true. It's the final twist. The final twist is -- that it's all OK.

MR: Talk to me about that whole second Earth thing. That kind of gave me pause me when I saw it.

RDM: It was built into the show when we decided to get to Earth. This was always the plan â€" the plan was to get to Earth, have it be a cinder, and then go, “God, where now?” And take the audience on this other journey and make them forget about that and not think about it. Because the concept of the show was to search for a place called Earth.

So we wanted to give that to you before you expected it and make it a downer and [have you go,] “Oh shoot, now what?” And now you’re really adrift. [The intention was] to put the audience with the characters, where they were really adrift and not hoping that anything better was going to happen.

And at the very last, at the very end, to then have a moment of hope, to have something to hang on to, and to give them the thing that they had quested for for so long, and to give that to the audience too.

MR: And so it’s as if this Earth is an homage to the other Earth, the first one.

RDM: I thought there was something interesting about that. This isn’t the original Earth. We’re actually [living on] an homage, as you said, to the original Earth. They come here and try to learn a lesson from the original Earth and make this Earth a better story.

MR: So the question is, did they learn their lesson?

RDM: Exactly. And the show could not answer that. It didn’t feel right for the show, like [happens] with so many things, to give a definitive answer to that. Any more than the show said, “This is the answer to terrorism, this is the answer to Iraq, these are the answers to security and freedom.” It gets to a place where you have an opportunity and you have a hope, but you couldn’t definitively say, “It’s going to be OK.”

MR: I went back and watched the closing moments of "Crossroads, Part 2" again, and the final image is of a planet that looks a lot like Earth. How does that fit in to what we see in "Daybreak"? Can you walk me through that?

RDM: That was all specifically thought out. The planet that you see at the end of "Crossroads" is this planet that we stand on. It has the North American continent and the South American [continent], it's very clear, we wanted it to be visually easy to identify for everybody.

Kara takes them to both Earths, as a matter of fact. She takes them to the original Earth, which, when we showed it in Revelations, we were careful to never quite be able to identify the land masses from orbit. We wanted you to accept it as Earth, and most people assumed it was this Earth, but we didn't want to flat out mislead you, so we didn't want to have it look like North America too.

MR: So Kara comes back in "Crossroads," she says, "I've been to Earth"…

RDM: She had been to that Earth. The original Earth.

MR: The crispy Earth.

RDM: She guided the fleet to get there. She takes us to that. That's part of her experience that she remembers. She remembers traveling there, seeing there, and comes back to the fleet saying, "I know how to get to that place."

In the finale, she makes an intuitive leap connecting the music as coordinates, enters the into the jump computer and those coordinates take us to the second Earth, this place.

MR: It was a little bit of a fakeout, you have to admit.

RDM: Yeah, we did a head fake. But I don't think it crosses the line, I don't think it's unduly misleading. I think you accept it as you go along. And clearly [we] wanted people to draw the connection that it was going to be this Earth, but we also didn't put anything in the show that prevented us from doing the finale the way we wanted to.

MR: There has been some one or some thing orchestrating these events. And you purposely chose to leave that ambiguous.

Sixbaltar RDM: It just felt like, you know, by its nature, the eternal, the divine, sort of defies concrete terminology. The more you attempt to state exactly what it is definitively, the less mysterious, the less supernatural, the less mysterious it becomes. And I thought, you can only go so far. You can kind of acknowledge a presence, you can acknowledge the hand of something else, and that was about as far as I thought that the show could comfortable show.

It was embedded in the mythology of the show since the miniseries, so that definitely had to be part of it, and it had to have a satisfying ending on that note, but I didn’t want to come right out and have a bearded guy in the heavens or something or sort of give voice to it. I just wanted to leave it mysterious. And as with so many things, the questions are more interesting than the answers are.

It's almost inherently something we can know. It seems like it's a continuing theme in mythology, that you can't really know the divine. You can experience it, you can encounter it, things can be revealed to you, but you can never really understand the mysteries at the heart of it. And the more you try to put definitions on it, the less satisfying it becomes. Once you get to the place where you imagine God as a bearded guy in a cloud, it becomes less satisfying.

Baltar's speech in CIC is pivotal -- "There's another presence here, we've all felt it, we've all seen its impact, we know it's around us, we know it's around us right now, and we have to have a leap of faith and trust that it's there and believe that it exists, even if you can't understand what it is and what its motivations are, if it has motivations."

MR: Part of what I got from the flashbacks was this idea that these people are making choices of their own free will. They're not just puppets on some divine strings.

RDM: Yeah. I think that's true. That's always one of the great contradictions of our existence, in a way. There are continuing themes in our lives that make us believe there is such a thing as fate, there is such a thing as destiny. And yet the belief that we have free will and we make our own decisions is equally powerful. Those two ideas are almost irreconcilable unless you believe that there is some sort of interplay between fate and free will that we can't really delineate specifically.

It does feel like there's a common thread of our existence, where we want to believe in both things strongly. We want to believe that we have a fate, a destiny, that we are meant to meet certain people, that we have soulmates, that certain people are born to achieve certain ends, that certain events are destined to happen, that are in the stars. Yet we also believe that we have free will and choice and that the decisions we make in our lives are meaningful.

MR: The Head characters, we’re to take them as representatives of that entity, the entity that we don’t necessarily define as good or evil?

RDM: I think one of the things the show has said from the beginning â€" you know, Leoben says, in the first season episode “Flesh and Bone,” he says, “What’s the first article of faith â€"  ‘Is this all that we are? Is this all that I am? Isn’t there something more?’” And I still believe that that’s part and parcel of the human condition, is that we continually ask ourselves, “Is this all that there is? Is there something more?”

And the furthest the show could go is to say, “Yes, there’s something more, but you  may not understand what it is. It’s something there, and it’s something you can touch into, and it may influence your life, but it defies religion and ideology and dogma. But there’s something.”

MR: Something actively participating…

RDM: Yeah, we are connected to it in some way.

MR: Were the flashbacks something you had in mind from the beginning, from when you started thinking about the finale?

RDM: They came in pretty late. It wasn't until we were breaking the story, we were breaking the plot of how they were going to rescue Hera. We kind of had the general scheme of it -- that Galactica would go fight the unfightable battle against the Cylons' Colony, rescue Hera in some manner, the ship's about to be destroyed and Kara would enter the "All Along the Watchtower" [theme as the jump coordinates] and that would take us to Earth. We knew that was the general direction.

We spent a day just in the room just chewing over plot: "How does Lee land? How does Kara get in? Which corridor are they going down?" It was frustrating and just kind of a pain in the [butt].

I went home, and I wasn't very happy. Took a shower and in the shower and in the shower I has this epiphany -- it was never about the plot. The joy of the show has always been in the characters. The next day on the whiteboard in the writers' room, I wrote, "It's the characters, stupid." I said, "We'll figure out the plot. There will be a plot, it will be good, we always manage to pull that stuff out, let's trust in that for now, and let's figure out what we want to do with these people."

I said, "I have some images, I don't know what I want to do with them. I have an image of a man in a house trying to chase a bird out with a broom. I don't know who it is, but I like it and it's somehow meaningful so let's put it up on the board."

I think it was David Weddle who talked about flashbacks or thinking about parts of their lives that we hadn't seen. Part of the finale, in our heads, had always been about beginnings and endings. It was the end of the show, the end of the Galactica, the beginning of a new life on Earth.

Ellen and tigh We started talking about the miniseries and where the characters began, and the show bible, which has backstories for characters like Laura -- I'd put the drunk driver and her sisters in the show bible but we'd never used it. We just started talking about a structure where we would have four or five stories told in flashbacks, and that that was really the A-story. The real story was about who these people were and how that informed their ending. That you would understand where they ended up by understanding where they began. All their flashback paths kind of take them too the show, and tell you who they were in the end.

Once we had that, the rest fell into place. The plot was pretty straightforward and it was exciting and we spent a lot of money and there was going to be a lot of bang and whoom and we just trusted that that was all going to work. And then it was just, who were these people in the flashbacks and what are the stories we want to tell?

MR: I think they gave where people ended up more weight. I actually got emotional when Baltar said, "You know, I know about farming." I don't think that would have had the same impact had we not seen him with his dad.

RDM: He was a person before the miniseries began. The miniseries posits him as Gauis Baltar, millionaire genius and playboy. But nobody's really just like that. Everybody is complex and has families and crises and dramas and stuff they're embarrassed about. This was a chance to open up Baltar a little bit more and, you know, he's a person. And this was his journey too.

MR: I know that you don’t let yourself be guided by what you think the fan reaction might be, and you do what you feel is right for the show, but the ending of Kara â€" her just disappearing like that. That’ll certainly be a starting point for debate.

RDM: Oh yeah, it’ll be controversial. There will be people who will absolutely hate it and think that we failed in our mission. We debated it in the [writers] room, I thought about it a long time, and I had sort of the same answer. And the more I struggled to give definition to it, the less satisfying it became. There various avenues we went down, discussions, saying she’s specifically this or that. And every time it felt uninteresting and kind of pedestrian.

It felt like, if she’s truly connected to the Eternal, if she’s connected to this other power, this other thing in the universe, as long as you know she’s connected to it and she’s fulfilled her destiny, brought us to this place, brought us to two Earths, really, that’s enough. That should just be left to your imagination, left to your inquiry, left you to try to fill in the blanks we leave. That was my answer and I’m sure -- I know â€" people will debate it.

Starbuck MR: It worked for me, but I also wondered, has she been a Head character this whole time?

RDM: That’s a legitimate way to look at it too. We talked about that, that is a legitimate way to read it.

MR: But the Head characters can’t actually interact with the world, so it’s not quite that.

RDM: This is a different thing, so it doesn’t fit neatly into that category either.

MR: The more I think about it, the more I think the Starbuck debate might set the Internets on fire.

RDM: I have more than accepted the fact that there will be people who will never quite get over that.

MR: I had this experience the day after the finale, I was walking around in New York and became very emotional all of a sudden. I was thinking of that final scene between Adama and Kara and Lee and then the moment where Kara winks out of existence, and I thought of the phrase, "The father, the son and the Holy Ghost." Having been raised Catholic, that just had so much resonance for me.

RDM: Yeah. I think it's rooted firmly in traditions like that. We talked about that about that very idea, the Trinity, and Kara as somehow being representative or at least connected to that idea. We talked a lot about the resurrection of Christ and its mythology and how that plays into a woman who literally dies and comes back to life for a certain purpose and then leaves again and gives hope that there is something else. She sort of lives in all those kinds of thoughts.

MR: And thank you for making her a woman.

RDM: Yeah. [laughs] There you go.

MR: You're really a pagan, that's what it is.

RDM: Yeah, I kind of am.

MR: There's part of you that likes ticking off the fans a little bit, right? [laughs] Do you ever anticipate it? Are there moments when you go, "I'm OK with this development, it works for me, and I think it'll really tick people off!"

RDM: As long as I'm pretty secure in what it is and the reasons why we're doing it, as long as we're not doing it just to tick them off. This is very much in that ballpark. We had lots of discussions about it, we explored lots of different avenues, and they were just all unsatisfying. If she just sprouted wings and flew up to the clouds, it would not be a satisfying ending. It just wouldn't. We never heard and I have yet to hear a concrete definition of Kara Thrace that becomes more satisfying than what we have.

What we have a has a sort of poetry and mystery to it and preserves the mystery and sort of lets people debate and think and wonder what she meant and where she came from and what that was all about. And it's also clear that she was about getting them to their salvation. She was the harbinger of death, and brought them to that, and she was the harbinger of life and brought them to that as well.

MR: It's interesting that your show provides these kinds of philosophical debate, but then there's that first hour, where there's all this awesome action and amazing scenes of robots fighting.

RDM: That's in our DNA, that's the DNA of "Battlestar Galactica."

MR: That first hour, it's also funny.

RDM: Yeah, it's got humor, it's a roller coaster.

MR: Was it your idea to have the old-school Centurions and new Centurions decking each other?

RDM: No, that's something [FX supervisor] Gary Hutzel and his guys came up with. And I laughed and said, "Sure."

MR: So just how over budget did you go? I was looking at that first hour going, “Wow, they really broke the bank.” 

Capsix RDM: It was written as a two-hour [episode], it was budgeted as a two-hour [episode]. The script came in, the production staff looked at it, worried about it. It was a reality check. There was no way could do it on a two-hour budget  and a two-hour time constraint. And the studio stepped up to the plate.

What I discovered, and I always knew this through the process of the show, but this really made it clear -- the people at the studio and the network were as big of fans as we were. And they moved heaven and Earth to essentially â€" they budgeted an extra hour. Once they added an extra hour, suddenly we had a whole extra hour’s budget to work with, with the exact same script.

MR: I understand the network’s needs, but I wish we’d seen it all at once. That first hour really works best as part of a whole.

RDM: Well, that’s the thing. I argued very long and hard against doing that. It was not written that way. In fact, when I wrote the script, it was not even written as acts [i.e. Act 1, Act 2, Act 3]. I wrote the script as a two-hour movie and it was meant to be seen that way. But it was one of those things where it was like, “Well, they’re giving you the extra money…”

MR: "So just shut up."

RDM: Just shut up at a certain point and move on. They wanted, for their own scheduling purposes, they felt that people were just not going to commit to tuning in at 8 p.m. for a show they were used to seeing later, nobody watches a three-hour movie, everybody watches a two-hour movie, blah blah blah. Episode 21 [“Daybreak, Part 1”], it’s not an episode. It’s a completely unsatisfying experience. I know that, because it was never intended to be [on its own].

MR: It’s just the first act of a play.

RDM: It’s the first act of a play. It doesn’t make any sense, it doesn’t have a coherent arc to it. It’s just a chunk that’s been broken off. I did manage to get them to agree to show all three hours this Friday. My hope is that some people will watch all three or at least they’ll watch them all together. It’ll live forever on DVD and they’ll watch it that way, and that’s the way it was always intended to be seen.

MR: You know very well that you can’t please everyone. To me, this half of the season has been very much about taking the characters to the end of their journeys. I think that pleases one group of fans. As you know, there are other fans who are like, “Answer the damn questions, Moore! What is the Opera House? What is Starbuck?” My feeling was, if a reasonable amount of those questions are answered and a reasonable amount of character finality takes place, then I’m OK with it. In that sense, that’s what I was looking for with the finale. 

RDM: I felt as we approached the second half of the season, and even the midpoint, “Let’s choose plot threads that we’re going to wrap up before the finale.” I didn’t want the final Cylon to be hanging, because then the whole finale would be about the final Cylon. I didn’t want it to be about when they’re going to find Earth. Let’s get that out of the way at least so the audience stops thinking about it. Let’s explain the backstory of the Final Five and where they came from and who they are and where Cavil and the other skinjobs came from. Let’s answer some questions along the way and then let’s decide. Let’s be smart about it and say, “What are the things we’re going to hold ’til the very end?”

Billlaura MR: And the Opera House visions -- were those, again, that entity speaking to these characters?

RDM: It was moving them towards a certain moment that would prove to be crucial, they had to take certain actions in certain ways, in order to enable the final drama to play through. Head Six’s interaction with Baltar was necessary because she had to get him to a place where he believed in God, or believed in the possibility of God as a concept or the supernatural in order to make the speech in CIC with Brother Cavil at that key moment.

MR: And actually believe it for once.

RDM: And actually believe it. And do it in a heartfelt way and make an earnest argument, to get Cavil to not kill Hera or not take her â€" to make everything else possible.

MR: One of my biggest outstanding questions was whether you would pay off the Cally story line. She got very little justice in life and I wanted her to get justice in death. I actually said this in a comment on my site, “They’re not going to answer the Cally thing, are they?” I am the worst predictor of anything, ever.

RDM: See, I deliberately buried that too. I said, let’s not even talk about Tory and Cally again. Let’s bury that card deep in the deck and then at this moment, when you’re not even remotely thinking about it,  let’s play that card. And then likewise, when you’re not even thinking about Earth, let’s play that card.

MR: Tyrol killing Tory -- that seemed like the kind of thing that would start the cycle of violence and hate again. It can be read so many ways, though. You could say, that was justice for Cally.

Torytyrol RDM: There's that. I was also interested in the idea that, out of the human emotions of vengeance and anger and murder came their final salvation at the same time. That there's this weird, contradictory currents through our lives -- amazing great things come out of horrible deeds, and vice versa. I wanted to play a last note on that and to make it, sort of, "What do we think about that? How do we feel about that moment?" It was all coming to a moment of resolution, and you kind of want to condemn him for it, and then you look at what happened after that, and you kind of want to celebrate him for it. You're caught between these two impulses and I like that. 


MR: That's getting me thinking about that scene between Athena and Boomer -- I can see how it may be wrong to kill Boomer, but at the same time, I can see Athena wanting to protect her child at all costs.

RDM: And it was meant to be that Boomer had pretty much made her choice. She knew and accepted and kind of wanted to die.

MR: We got so much mythology about Hera and how important she was. In the end, was she important just because she was a living, sentient being and not just a lab rat or an oracle?

RDM: There's all that, but she's also literally the embodiment of the human and the Cylon race and that literally becomes who we are. In the end, all of use are the children of Hera, which means we're the children of all these people we've witnessed throughout the show. Their humanity survives through us, so do the Cylons.

MR: So that dream of the two races living together -- she was the embodiment of that.

RDM: Yeah, she was the embodiment of that. As are we.

MR: James Poniewozik emailed me a question, here it is: "It seems to me like we pretty much are repeating the 'cycle.' So wouldn't we have been better off if the fleet had just offed themselves? Or at least, just given us the technology and kept their philosophy/gods/etc, instead of the other way around?"

RDM: Well, I guess that depends on what happens from here on out. It seemed like the cycle has come to another key point. The cycle can still be broken, and the question is, like they say at the end, will it be broken? It leaves it unanswered and I don't think there is an answer.

MR: It's up to us, I guess.

RDM: That's where we wanted the show ultimately to get to -- it's up to us. 

MR: What was the decision like to put yourself in that final scene? Was that a long debate that you had or what?

RDM:You know what? I just thought it was a lark, I thought, “I’m going tobe that guy at the newsstand reading a magazine.” It was like thislittle weird cameo. Every time I watch it now, I start flinching, andfeeling like I shouldn’t have done that, because it really distracts mewhen I watch it. And I feel like it’s going to distract people. It’slike, [expletive], I didn’t mean it to be so prominent. I just thoughtit would be a fun little deal, and it’s sort of a bigger presence oncamera than I thought.

Operahouse MR: I guess maybe from an aesthetic standpoint or a journey-ending standpoint, part of me thought it would be really beautiful to end the entire series on that shot of Adama on the hillside with Laura Roslin's grave. Was that ever a thought or did you have that image of Caprica Six in Times Square and that was what you wanted?

RDM: We had that image a couple years ago. I always wanted to get to there. That image -- Times Square in the modern day -- only works in terms of servicing the Hera story. It really is about paying off Hera's story. That last scene is really all about her, why she was important, who are we, "Oh my God, we're connected to her and the Cylons," and the cycle of time and will it repeat? It seemed like that sort of grander arc in the show demanded that it also sort of be resolved and it be resolved on that note.

Part 2: Remarks by Edward James Olmos, Mary McDonnell, Ron Moore and David Eick after the finale screening on March 16.

I have not transcribed every single word of this panel. Because at this stage, my fingers are in danger of falling off after all the transcription I've done lately.

Was Kara just an angel, and were we all chasing down a rabbit hole or something when we assumed that her father was Daniel, this missing eighth Cylon?

RDM: Daniel was definitely a rabbit hole. It was an unintentional rabbit hole, to be honest. I was kind of surprised when I began picking up on speculation online among people that Daniel â€" [who was,] for those of you who don’t know, a deep part of the Cylon backstory that had to do with one of the Cylon skinjobs that was created by the Final Five, who was sort of aborted by Brother Cavil in the deep, deep backstory of the show. It was always intended just to be sort of an interesting bit of backstory about Cavil, his jealousy, a sort of Cain and Abel allegory. Then people started really grabbing on to it and seizing on it as some major part of the mythology. In a couple of interviews and in the last podcast, I’ve gone out of my way to say, “Don’t spend too much time and energy on this particular theory, because it was never intended to be that major a piece of the mythology.” It was never intended to take that kind of load-bearing weight.

DE: It’s like Boxey in that way.

RDM: Kara is what you want her to be. I think Kara â€" it’s easy to put a label on her of angel or messenger of God or something like that. Kara Thrace died and resurrected and [inaudible] and took people to their final end, and that was sort of her role, her destiny in the show. That’s sort of the long and the short of it. We debated back and forth in the writers room for a while about giving more definition, giving her more clarity and saying “This is definitively what she is.” And we started to say, the more you try to sort of outline and give voice to and put a name on it, the less interesting it became, and we just decided this was the most interesting way to go out, with her just disappearing and [you’re] wondering just exactly what she was.

Are we to assume that there are a lot of pissed-off Cavils out there still, or ...there’s no definitive answer, or they were destroyed?

RDM: Well, the final final [cut] came out a little less clear on that level than I certainly intended. It’s one of those things we didn’t quite see through all the way to the end. It was scripted and the idea was, that when Racetrack bumps [the button on the controls], hits the nukes, the nukes come in, smack into the Colony, takes the Colony out of the stream that was swirling around the singularity and it fell in and was destroyed and torn apart. I think as we went through the show and kept pulling out [moments for] time and we kept cutting frames and doing this and that, one of the things that became less apparent was that the Colony was doomed.

At what point, Ron, did you decide to make it Earth in the past that were going to wind up at, and what was your reasoning for that?

Karazak RDM: We decided that quite a while ago, a couple of years ago. I don’t think we ever really had a version of the show where we talked about it being in the future of being in the present. Those didn’t seem as interesting. We sort of, in the early going, [began to] started talking about the fact that we would see a lot of contemporary things in the show, from language to wardrobe to all sorts of production design details. And that only made sense to us in terms of, actually a lot of the things that we see in the show and  we feel are taken from our contemporary world are actually theirs to begin with and somehow spread down through the eons and came down to us through the collective unconscious or [inaudible].

DE: There was a time when we were talking about literally, you know, they land and it’s pterydactls and Tyrannosaurus rex. But it was really the idea that they were part of the sort of genus of humankind and this seemed like the right and more affordable way to do that than “Jurassic Park.” [laughter]

RDM: We had the idea of Six walking through Times Square â€" we came up with a long time ago.

Do you have any clues as to who attacked the original Earth… and why did Cavil shoot himself?

RDM: The backstory of the original Earth was supposed to be that the 13th Tribe of Cylons came to that world, started over and essentially destroyed themselves. There was some internecine warfare that occurred among the Cylons themselves, which was another repetition of the cycles "all this has happened before and will happen again."  …

Cavil killing himself came from Dean Stockwell. [in the script, Tigh was supposed to fling over the edge of a higher level in the CIC.] Dean called me himself and said, "You know, I just really think that in that moment, Cavil would realize the jig is up and it's all hopeless and just put a gun in his mouth and shoot himself.

This is for the actors, what was the last scene you filmed and how hard was it to complete that?

MM: My last scene was my last scene, it was Laura Roslin's last moment in the Raptor. And that was at about 4:45 a.m., on a very small set. I think I was one of the first people to wrap. And she died. My son and I went to the airport and flew to L.A. [laughs] It happened quickly, it wasn't set to happen then, it was set to happen a week later. And the schedule was changed.

EJO: My last day was the [last shot of Adama] on the mountainside. It was the last moment that I'm on camera. It was quite an experience all the way around, that moment in time. It was  real easy. I think everybody had a real easy time with the emotions that we had at the very end.

[To sum up part of the question, it was about the Watchtower theme/"All Along the Watchtower"] Are you trying to get at some notion that  this is some kind of universal consciousness that goes back as far as the human and Cylon races have been in existence. Or is there some history to the song in this narrative that I'm missing?

RDM: Yes [laughter]. The notion is sort of what you posited. The music, lyrics, the composition is divine, it's eternal, it's something that lives in the collective unconsciousness of everyone on the show. … It's sort of a connection of the divine and the mortal. Music is something people literally catch out of the air, they can't really tell you and define exactly how they compose it. Here is a song that transcends many eons and many different people and cultures, literally across the stars, and ultimately was reinvented by one Mr. Bob Dylan.

DE: It was a simple way, I thought to communicate clearly that this is not the future, that this is a story [that related] to ours. [There was a plan to introduce the song in Season 1 but they ended up feeling it was too soon.] We were thinking about it that far back, that music would be a great way to say to the audience, "No, no, this all follows that cyclical theme of this has all happened before and it will happen again." This culture is the one that gave birth to ours… [All the slang and cultural stuff,] we get that from them, not the other way around.

[Setting an end date] -- did that right the ship in some ways or change the process for you?

RDM: Well, I know in terms of the writers room, it certainly focused us. We kind of made the decision that the fourth season would be the last season at the end of the third season. [It made them more focused and specific about ending the show.] Part of the motivation to make it the final season was that we didn't want to get to the place that we felt like the ship was keeling over and had a problem. We also instinctively felt the show has reached the third act by the time it got to the end of that third season. [He added that there was a more intense energy level on the set in the final season.]

MM: As you are able to do when you're doing a play, you can then kind of kick into gear and plot your finish. And what that ends up doing is simplifying things for you because you know where you're headed. And you can let go. … I think a lot of us felt a kind of simplification and a humility that came over us. It gives you a lot of energy. You just know where you're going and proud to be a part of it and you let go.

EJO: We had a meeting at the very beginning of the show … in my trailer … 13 of us.

MM: He had the biggest trailer. It really was great, we really miss our trailers.

EJO: We sat down and discussed what we were doing and what the possibilities were. We talked about making sure that we understood that if by chance … [the show] was to move forward as a series … that we had to understand that. I don't think anyone had done a complete series. Had you?

MM: No, I never made it past 13 [episodes].

Daddy EJO: We finished "Miami Vice," we did five years, but we never really had a finish with it. There was never some plan. … I just know if we did this, we would go through this story and the story would have a beginning, a middle and an end. And that we had to pace ourselves. So [starting] the fourth season, we had a meeting and we were told then that this was going to be the final season. So everyone got very, very depressed. I don't think anyone wanted to stop the show. Ron made it very clear from the conception that there was a beginning, a middle and an end. And we had hit the end.

So in our meeting, we talked about the very first time we'd gotten together. And [we said] it's a marathon. In a marathon you have to … start out strong. The next 25 miles has to be consistent. … Then the last mile has to be the strongest mile. We all knew that going into the final [season].

That very last scene, the Head characters, are they angels or are they demons?


RDM: Well, I think they're both. WE never tried to name exactly what the Head characters [are]. ...We never really looked at them as angels or demons because they seemed to periodically say evil things and good things and they tended to save peple and tended to damn people and there was a sense that they were in the service of something else… that was guiding, helping, sometimes obstructing, sometimes tempting the mortal people on the show. The idea at the very end was, whatever they are in service of continues and is eternal and is always around and they too are still here with us, with all of us who are the children of Hera. …

Part 3: A few words from Mary McDonnell

MR: You’ve attended a lot of events during your career â€" is this one special to you?

MM: Totally. Because it’s brand new. It’s something I’ve never experienced before. Very few of us have experienced this idea, that policy and ideas that come from the collective can be supported by the entertainment industry in a way that has no political agenda. It’s really about connecting to human rights, that’s really what the whole thing is about.

Maryfountain MR: I think "Battlestar" would never have worked had the writers had this list of, "Here are important topics we're going to bring up."
 
MM: It wouldn’t work. Ron knows that almost better than anyone. He creates from a place that doesn’t seem to be conscious of what people need. He has an instinct for it. It’s in his subconscious. But because he isn’t trying to teach anyone anything, he incorporates the human experience, which includes a great deal of humor and a great deal of complexity. He’s kind of a master at this at understanding this. I don’t think he really knew [it would eventually get this kind of reception].

MR: Yeah, six years ago, who knew your show would end up here?

MM: This and the AFI Awards and the Peabody Award â€" these feel like the path of this show. The sort of destiny of the show. If eventually the Emmys become a part of that, that’s wonderful, but that doesn’t seem to be the end of the line. This is the point. The point of this show is that something like this can happen.

MR: You said something on the panel, about how the goal of the artist is to connect with the world. 

MM: Completely there’s no other reason to do it. The experience of doing it means nothing unless you feel like you’ve connected to the people at large. And in this experience [with the fans of the show], the people are so smart, so verbal, and they give so much back that you feel like you’ve just been given a warm bath.

MR: The young people that were here, they had some good questions. It seems like they wonder about technology more than we do.

MM: They know that they are the leaders of all the technology [developments]. They have questions, they don’t really know how to bring their compassion along. They’re trying to figure out -- how do we tie the human element of our heart and compassion into this quickly evolving mechanism we’re using. They’re afraid they're going to lose something and to a certain extent, they will, if technology and the heart don’t connect. And I think Ron is trying to talk about that.

MR: Because the whole show is about connecting.
 
MM: Right. Totally.

Part 4: My thoughts on the finale

Wow.

We didn't just get one finale, we got two.

There was the first hour, and then there was the final hour. I had different reactions to each hour. But overall, I loved it.

It was pretty frakkin' wonderful.

Billadama There were a few things that gave me pause the first time around. You can see what those things were in the interview above -- I asked Ron Moore a lot of questions about things I wanted to understand more. When I watched the finale again on Friday, having had a few days to digest my first viewing of the finale, it all came together for me, even more than it did the first time.

I felt a wonderful sense of closure. Bear McCreary's music once again moved me on a molecular level. As did the performances and the bittersweet sadness as we all said goodbye -- the characters to each other, the actors to these roles, the audience to this complex and confounding and compelling world. 

Finales are notoriously difficult to do -- so few shows have done them well. But "Battlestar" showed me where everyone ended up and gave me things to think about along the way.

Plus, Centurions fighting! GODS!

Words can’t begin to convey how much I loved the first hour of “Daylight” (it's actually the second hour -- as Moore said above, all of "Daylight" works much better when you see all three hours of the finale together).

I flat-out, 200 percent, absolutely and with fist-pumping glee looooooved what transpired from the moment Adama drew the red line down the center of the hanger deck until the moment the Galactica jumped away from the Colony.

It’s not just one of the finest hours “Battlestar” has ever done, it’s one of the finest hours of television I’ve ever seen. I felt like a 10 year old kid watching “Star Wars.” Thank you, Gary Hutzel and crew: Those battle scenes made me positively giddy.

Come on, old-school Centurions and new-school Centurions in hand-to-hand combat? The finale could have featured Boxey as a deus ex machina and I would have forgiven even that. That's how good the battle and combat sequences were.

Still, it wasn’t just the extraordinarily exciting space battles that thrilled me, though once again Hutzel and his team outdid themselves. And it wasn’t just the sheer excitement of watching nearly every single character engaging in combat, even frakkin' Baltar. (So his one moment of combat glory involved him shooting a Centurion that was already down. Whatever. He still strapped on a gun and made the attempt. As my friend Andrew said, by not leaving the Galactica, he "pulled a Han Solo." Respect.)

Each of those elements was great on its own. But it all added up in the battle sequence, to something even more wonderful than the sum of the constituent parts.

Kateeeddie The visuals, the mood, the atmosphere, the terse dialogue â€" it all came together to masterfully convey a sense of impending doom and a feeling of finality. There was the installation of Anders in CIC, his wires looming over the crew like the web of a great spider. There was sight of Centurions on the flight deck, something we thought we’d never see. There were glimpses of the crew, planning their assault, which promised to be bloody and difficult. And there was that scene of Cottle and Laura, which was made of awesome.

And there had to be one last "into the breach" exhortation from Adama: "She will not fail us if we don't fail her."

By gods, the old girl didn't fail them. Even after they rammed her into the Colony. Wow.

All that, and they brought the funny, too.

I certainly wasn’t expecting the finale of this show to make me laugh, but how could you not laugh at the idea of President Lampkin? (I want it known that if there was a spinoff involving President Lampkin and Admiral Hoshi, I would totally watch that show.). How about Baltar when we first glimpsed him in his battle gear? Faintly but disinctly hilarious.

Then there was Tigh’s suggestion to Adama regarding the Cylons: “It’s still not too late to flush them all out the airlock.”

Aside from the jokes, the raid on the Colony contained some key character moments as well. There was Cavil, once again proving, through his snarky asides to Doral and Simon, that he’s possibly the universe’s worst boss (seriously, why did those other Cylon models stick with him for so long? Really, working for Michael Scott or even Dwight Schrute seems preferable).

There was Boomer and Athena’s encounter. (And even that had its share of humor. When it appeared that Athena might spill the beans about what their plan was, Starbuck interjected, “Can you not tell her the plan?”)

Boomer gave Hera back to Athena, but it was too little, too late, in Athena’s eyes. She killed Boomer. I can see how that might scar little Hera for life â€" to see one copy of Mommy kill another â€" but I can see how, in Athena’s eyes, there was only one way to be rid of the troublesome Boomer forever. If that’s what it took to protect her child, she would do it.

We saw a flashback of Boomer and the Old Man, back when she was still a new pilot. He allowed her to stay on his ship, despite the fact that she couldn’t stick her landings. She promised to pay Adama back one day for his continued faith in her.

Bsgcast And that’s what all those flashbacks told us; when these characters made the key decisions that put their lives on this course. Boomer stayed with the Galactica instead of bailing out, and that brought her to this moment. Adama stayed in the service, rather than bail out for a cushy job in the private sector. Rather than waste her time on affairs with (admittedly hot) younger men, Roslin chose to join Adar’s campaign, which eventually brought her to the Galactica.

Something about these characters’ basic natures asserted themselves in those moments, and thus, in a way, they orchestrated their own fates. There may have been some divine force guiding events, but these people chose these paths.

I suppose I had a little trouble with the Lee-Starbuck flashback. You could see that Lee fell in love with her almost from the moment he saw her. But she certainly seemed to be in love with Zak. It’s no secret that Starbuck could be a self-destructive party girl, but all it took for her to put the moves on her boyfriend’s brother was a few drinks and one philosophical late-night conversation? I don't know. I thought Starbuck was capable of more loyalty than that. Still, she and Lee didn't actually do anything major, and there’s every chance she let Zak pass his basic flight course not just because she wanted to stay with him but because she felt guilty about her attraction to his brother.

That's our Starbuck -- complicated and conflicted 'til the end.

In any case, the flashbacks and the rest of the scenes, throughout these final hours, reminded me of a symphony. There were movements, themes, moods, all orchestrated to bring us to a final resting place. We got closure. We had moments of great emotion. And I'm going to say it again -- all of the music was gorgeous. The Celtic melodies, the Opera House music, the Watchtower theme.

As Kara keyed in the coordinates of that final jump, McCreary's music raised the hair on the back of my neck. There’s one word in my handwritten notes for this sequence: “Amazing.”

Now, my response to the first hour was just sheer, uncomplicated pleasure. The second hour gave me a few pauses the first time around, as I noted above. But I must admit, in all honesty, the second time around, those things didn't really give me much pause. I'm sure there are things we could nitpick all day, but I'm so not in a mood to nitpick. Not when I've just seen this show, in a very major way, stick the landing.

I have a feeling some will be angry about Starbuck just disappearing. I have a feeling some people will hate that. Not only did we not find out definitively who or what re-made her and sent her back to the fleet (and how that was done), when all was said and done, she just winked out of existence.

I was perfectly at peace with the disappearance of Starbuck. I didn't know why until the day after the finale, when I was walking down Madison Avenue in New York City and it hit me like a thunderbolt.

Trinity The Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost.

I'm not going to make some tortured analogy about Lee, Adama and Starbuck representing the Trinity, because, though it is intriguing, it doesn't completely hold up. But still, having been raised Catholic, there was something powerfully right about that idea. Lapsed as I am, it made sense to me on a subconscious, instinctual level. Those three have always been the center of the show, and it just struck me why those central relationships always resonated so strongly, for me anyway.

Having been raised from birth with ideas about the workings of the Holy Ghost (that was even the name of our parish), something about Starbuck just fit that idea, the idea of a divine influencer. A holy spirit.

Another thought about Starbuck: I recently came across this passage in the "Dhammapada," a foundational Buddhist text. Here are verses 346-348 (from the 2005 Shambhala Publications translation by Gil Fronsdal):

"Having cut even this, they go forth,
Free from longing, abandoning sensual pleasures.
Those attached to passion
Are caught in a river [of their own making]
Like a spider caught in its own web.
But having cut even this, the wise set forth,
Free from longing, abandoning all suffering.

"Let go of the past, let go of the future,
Let go of the present.
Gone beyond becoming,
With the mind released in every way,
You do not again undergo birth and old age."

How gorgeous is that phrase: "Gone beyond becoming."

To me, that's where Starbuck is. And after everything she's been through, she deserves to be at rest, wherever, whatever she is. She deserves to break her own personal cycle of pain and longing. Godspeed, Starbuck.

As for the final moments, there were so many beautiful images in the last hour of finale -- the fleet heading toward the sun, Starbuck saying goodbye to Anders, Adama taking out a Viper one last time.

Operahouse2 Adama saying goodbye to Lee and Starbuck was gracefully handled. I loved the callback to their first conversation in the miniseries: "What do you hear, Starbuck?" "Nothing but the rain." "Grab your gun and bring in the cat."

Baltar and Caprica Six finding their way toward real love throughout the finale was beautiful to see, and for some reason, right at the end, when his voice broke as he said, "You know, I know about farming," it made me nearly cry. This was Baltar finally acknowledging his past, finally becoming a real person. Who would have thought the callous skirt-chaser glimpsed in the flashbacks would ever be capable of such real humanity?

And then there were the Roslin-Adama moments, and they were the most moving of all. If you can think about Adama putting his ring on her finger without getting choked up…. Well, I can't. 

That final image of Adama sitting on that hill would have been a lovely way to end the series. I actually did think that was the ending, until suddenly we were confronted with a very different image -- a modern metropolis 150,000 years later.

My biggest objection to the finale -- and it's not an "oh they ruined it" one -- is this: I really, really disliked the footage of the robots in that final scene. For a show that often came at things subtly, everything about that robot footage and other aspects of the scene felt much too obvious.

Tricia Actually, the entire scene was quite different from what came before. It was quite a tonal switch. It was jarring to go from such lyrical moments to such exposition-y stuff. (And if you know what he looks like  -- and perhaps the majority of "Battlestar" fans don't -- seeing Moore in the scene was odd too. It took me out of the moment). 

Still. Having enjoyed so many other things about the finale, I'm just going to let that one go.

So. In closing. There can be no summing up.

I don't know how to say goodbye to this show (and I guess with "The Plan" to look forward to, I can just pretend it's "au revoir").

My words are failing, so I'm going to steal someone else's. In the "Battlestar Galactica in the Media" thread on Television Without Pity, a debate began about "BSG" vs "The Wire" (the discussion continued on the "BSG Comparisons" board). The discussion was prompted by a piece in the Guardian calling "BSG" better than "The Wire."

By law, TV critics are required to call "The Wire" important, great, amazing, ambitious and so forth. It is all those things, without a doubt. If we're talking just about sheer consistency, "The Wire" (and "The Shield," for that matter) beat almost all comers, including "BSG." (Know that I understand that there is no "best" TV series and there can be no winner of that debate.)

But this statement from Effra sums up my feelings perfectly.

"...If I had to choose to have only seen one of them, I would choose 'Battlestar' every single time. 'The Wire' is an extraordinary testament to a particular time and place and the kind of lives that are lived in Baltimore and cities like it. 'Battlestar' is an even more extraordinary meditation on the human condition that to me stands up there with some of the great mythological stories about that. It also gives an emotional way for us to think about it for own lives in the way 'The Wire' can't, unless one is living a life like those in Baltimore.

"I learned a lot from watching 'The Wire' and I thought about things I hadn't thought about before. But it didn't get into my soul. 'Battlestar' has and it will stay there."

That's it. "Battlestar" got into my soul.

No other show has reached into the core of my being and made me physically feel so much: Fear, nausea, anxiety, excitement, tension, exhilaration, joy. Sometimes I cried, other times -- as during much of the first hour of the finale -- it made me want to stand up and cheer.

Throughout its four seasons, through the wobbles and the detours and the shocks and the amazing moments and the revelatory beauty, this show mixed action, philosophy, human emotion and compassion in a way I've never encountered before.

And I fear that all this… won't happen again.

I'll miss the way this show moved me. I'll miss these people. I'll miss the great action and the space battles and the mordant humor and even the misfires, because as this show often pointed out, mistakes are what make us human.

Saulmftigh I feel incredibly sentimental right now, as I think about the fact that "Battlestar" began around the time that I began writing about television. It forced me to be better at my job.

It forced me to think harder, to write better, to be more rigorous. And this job has granted me many pleasures, but one of the biggest was turning friends, family and readers into raving fans of Adama, Roslin, Starbuck and the rest.

I'll miss this flickering electronic campfire we all sat around every Friday, talking about our reactions to the story we'd just been told.

Thanks to everyone who made the show.

Thanks to all the readers who joined in these discussions.

Three cheers for the grand old lady.

So say we all!


Doctor: Lack of medical helicopter cost actress Natasha Richardson
As a steady stream of celebrities pay their last respects to Natasha Richardson, questions are arising over whether a medical helicopter might have been able to save the ailing actress.
Citizen Kafka's Greatest Contribution? Himself

Richard Shulberg was a musician, a radio personality and by all accounts, an unrepentant comedic force in the lives of many who knew him. Most knew him by his stage name, Citizen Kafka. Shulberg died last Saturday at the age of 61 after a series of illnesses.