Sabtu, 07 November 2009

Opening day: 'Christmas Carol' debut not looking too jolly

Opening day: 'Christmas Carol' debut not looking too jolly

"A Christmas Carol" Walt Disney Studios' big-budget holiday bet "A Christmas Carol" got off to a soft start Friday, selling a studio-estimated $9 million in the U.S. and Canada.

Based on the performance of similar films, that means the motion-capture-animated tale starring Jim Carrey should gross $30 million to $35 million through Sunday, a relatively weak debut given its production budget of nearly $200 million and Disney's substantial investment in marketing.

Pre-release surveys had indicated the movie would open to at least $40 million domestically over its first three days.

A soft launch at home won't necessarily be a lump of coal in Disney's stocking, however. Several other family movies have done huge business overseas this year, and the studio is surely hoping "A Christmas Carol" will do the same. In addition, family movies often play for a long time in theaters. Director Robert Zemeckis' previous motion-capture holiday tale, "The Polar Express," grossed $30.6 million in its first five days after debuting on a Wednesday and went on to collect a healthy $162.8 million.

"This Is It" had a strong hold for a concert movie. Sony's Michael Jackson film saw ticket sales drop 47% on Friday from a week earlier, putting it on track for a full weekend decline of closer to 40% and a three-day gross of about $14 million. Most concert movies decline more than 50% on their second weekends.

Overture's "The Men Who Stare at Goats" and Universal's release of Gold Circle's "The Fourth Kind" appear headed toward openings in the low- to mid-teens, while "The Box" from Warner Bros is on track to gross about $8 million by Sunday.

-- Ben Fritz

Photo: A scene from "A Christmas Carol." Credit: ImageMovers Digital


Sarah Palin's book tour skirts blue states
Sarah Palin's book tour is a gift for her base. No stops are planned in Seattle, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Los Angeles and other major cities and book-buying communities that are standard for authors on the road, but where the voters tend to be Democrats.
Poker, Power Go Hand In Hand, Author Says

American history is filled with powerful men who have have honed their competitive strategies around the card table. In Cowboys Full: The Story of Poker, author James McManus details how the game's logic is reflected in our history of battles and business.


Jumat, 06 November 2009

Paging Dr. Sexy: Let's talk about 'Supernatural's' enjoyable 'Changing Channels'

The Morning Fix: Waiting for Oprah. Moonves is bullish! Walmart slashing prices. Littlefield to pen tell-all (or more likely, tell-some)

After the coffee. Before getting depressed that "Sesame Street" turned 40.

Will she or won't she? It's that time of the decade again where everyone starts trying to figure out whether Oprah Winfrey will keep doing her daytime talk show or not when her deal is up in 2011. The newest round of speculation kicked off when the Los Angeles Times and others noted that the latest hire to work on OWN, the Oprah Winfrey/Discovery Communications-backed cable network in the works, was one of the talk queen's top producers. That was seen as a possible sign that perhaps Winfrey too would jettison the show to focus on OWN. Then Deadline took that speculation a step (or maybe a dozen steps) further and reported that Winfrey actually already had decided to move her daily show to OWN in 2011. That was quickly denied by both Winfrey's production company and CBS, which distributes the talk show. Both said no decision on the show has been made. Now today, the New York Times weighs in on the various options Winfrey has to choose from. Tired yet?

It's too soon to begin to look a lot like Christmas. But why should that stop Hollywood? This weekend, just one week after Halloween and three weeks before Thanksgiving, the Christmas movie season officially opens with Disney's "A Christmas Carol" remake. Forecasts and predictions from the Los Angeles Times and the Wrap.

CTlogosmall Happy Birthday. "Sesame Street" turns 40 next week. The show, which has won a record 122 Emmys, still shoots in Queens, New York, and often gets as many big-name guests as "Saturday Night Live." Among those who have visited with Oscar and Big Bird and the rest lately include Adam Sandler, Ricky Gervais, Cameron Diaz and Jimmy Fallon. USA Today looks at the history and challenges of Sesame Street.

Stop the presses, CBS's Moonves is bullish! CBS Corp. swung to a profit in the third quarter and its ever-upbeat CEO Leslie Moonves said the company is seeing "strong evidence" of an economic recovery. The network's biggest boost came from reruns sales of its dramas including "Criminal Minds" and "Medium." Details from the Los Angeles Times. On that note, Variety reports that CBS has already sold reruns of its new hit "NCIS: Los Angeles" to USA Network for a walloping $2.5 million per episode.

Will must-see mean must-read? Warren Littlefield, the longtime NBC programmer who was one of the architects of entertainment during the Peacock's glory years, is writing a memoir on those days. Littlefield, who was known for (among other things)  asking questions then answering them, told Variety that the book would be an "honest, accurate, fun-filled tour."

Want to get depressed? It's time for the Hollywood Reporter's annual "Next Generation" special in which the paper lists the top executives under the age of 35, which no doubt leads to screaming from those not on it and anxiety for those who are over the age limit. Between that and "Sesame Street" turning 40, it's not a good day for us boomers and aging Gen-Xers.

Inside the Los Angeles Times: Walmart Stores Inc. is cutting its DVD prices to $10, which will no doubt start a price war among retailers. Betsy Sharkey on the remake of  "A Christmas Carol" and "Precious." John Horn on the perils of taking "Spider-Man" to Broadway.

-- Joe Flint

Follow me on Twitter.


Paging Dr. Sexy: Let's talk about 'Supernatural's' enjoyable 'Changing Channels'

Welcome, veteran commenters, newcomers and fellow "Supernatural" fans of all kinds! Let's discuss "Changing Channels," Thursday's episode of the CW show.

For information about upcoming episodes of the show, look here. For all my stories on "Supernatural," look here.

If you are new around here, please take a minute to review the commenting rules at the end of this post. If you don't see your comment show up below, those rules might give you an insight as to why that happened.

Now, on to some thoughts about "Changing Channels"...

CCbike Tandem bike!

"Jackpot"!

Sam as the voice of the Metallicar!

There were some absolutely delightful moments in "Changing Channels," a funny episode with a serious twist. Kudos not only to the writers but to Jared Padalecki and Jensen Ackles, who once again proved how versatile they are. As is the case with the best episodes of "Supernatural," a clever concept served to illuminate an issue affecting the Winchester's lives. In "Changing Channels," the show had a lot of fun with TV conventions even as it reinforced the brothers' vessel-icious dilemmas. Good times. 

I thought I'd kick things off by listing my favorite parodies in order of awesomeness:

1. "Knight Rider." I died of laughter at the Metallicar tribute to "Knight Rider." Sam as the voice of the car was 120 percent hilarious. The soundtrack was spot-on and the way the camera was angled on the car when it drove down the leaf-strewn road was a perfect evocation of the original show. This short scene was about a thousand times more entertaining than the craptastic "Knight Rider" remake NBC unleashed a while back. Hey, "Supernatural," I smell spinoff!

2. The opening credits were absolutely awesome. I can only imagine how much fun the writers, production team and actors had putting this sequence together. Every single aspect of it was golden, from the song to the typeface to the "We're just brothers goofing around and having a few laughs" scenes. That was just a heaping slab of hilarious right there. Honestly -- tandem bike!

3. "CSI: Supernatural." I'm with Dean -- I'm not particularly a fan of the 40 million procedurals on TV, and any time someone breaks out a really good David Caruso parody, I'm on board. Sam's swagger toward the camera and the brothers' recitation of the intentionally bad puns were outstanding, as were the comments about "no-talent d-bags" who wear sunglasses at night.

CCnutcracker 4. The Japanese game show. Just funny. As was the genital herpes ad. More funny than the actual ad was Sam's discomfort about speaking his lines. Both actors can play comedy really well, but Jared especially nailed the funny moments in this episode. 

5. The sitcom. It was mildly amusing, and it gave Jared and Jensen opportunity to demonstrate how good they are at comedy -- and at sending up overly broad comedic performances on schticky sitcoms.

6. "Grey's Anatomy." This segment did have its moments, and it is amusing to picture Dean as a secret fan of soapy medical melodramas (is it just me, or did Dean have a bit of a mancrush on Dr. Sexy?). And I should say, I don't think any of the TV parodies were bad, per se -- they all brought a smile to my face -- but I can't escape the feeling that the "Grey's" segment went on a little too long. But I had to love the moment when the boys spotted a doctor's ghost boyfriend (who of course was played on "Grey's" by Jeffrey Dean Morgan, a.k.a. John Winchester). "This show has ghosts too? Why?" Good question, Sam. And of course the spot-on folky-poppy song that played in the background for much of the "Grey's" segment was so perfect because "Supernatural" and "Grey's" have the same music supervisor -- Alexandra Patsavas.

CClaugh I shouldn't limit my praise to Patsavas -- far from it. Everyone involved in the making of this episode went above and beyond the call of duty. The score was well-matched to each segment (again, that cheeseball opening-credits song was classic). Director Charles Beeson did an excellent job of imitating each of the very different shows being parodied. (The only real quibble I have about the look of "Changing Channels" is that the "Grey's" set didn't look much like the ABC show -- it looked like every hospital scene we've ever seen on "Supernatural." I'd imagine budget limitations might have been part of the issue there.)

One small note: I'm glad that Castiel wasn't really part of the comedic aspects of the episode. As perceptive fans have said on this site in previous discussions, CasComedy often works best when he is the stunned or befuddled straight man reacting to situations that are unfamiliar to him. So the sparing use of him here was just right. Anything more than that would have been pushing the character too far, and as it was, there was plenty of funny to go around without inserting Cas into the proceedings.

One other stray thought: Did the Winchesters and/or Castiel go to Costco and pick up an extra-large container of Ye Olde Angel-Trapping Oil? They sure seem to have a lot of that stuff lying around, which is lucky for them.

CCtrickster But seriously -- and, seriously, who knew there would be such a somber ending to this episode? -- guest star Richard Speight, Jr. proved his versatility also. He did an excellent job of playing the comedic side of the Trickster, but then he effortlessly shifted gears and gave a very credible performance as the resentful, angry Gabriel. 

Boy, these angels really have some daddy issues, am I right?

Perhaps part of the story of this season is about boys becoming men. The Winchesters have had to figure out how to relate to each other as adults who have differing opinions and sometimes differing agendas. The discussion between Sam and Dean about not having the luxury of a "moral stance" indicated that the brothers can at least have somewhat difficult discussions now without blowing up at each other, even if they don't necessarily agree.

But as others have pointed out, the angels, for all their power, lack any real maturity. Cas is at least starting to make his own choices, but Gabriel and Raphael feel adrift without someone telling them what to do. They just want the doubt and conflict to be over. They want Michael and Lucifer -- the older brothers who are at war because Dad isn't around to settle the fight -- to finish their tussle and either let the world go down in flames or keep on muddling along.

It'll be interesting to see if Cas (or anyone else) does find God -- but part of me thinks He won't be found (honestly, how do you cast that role?). Or if He is located, I bet God won't intervene in the way that the angels want him to. And as the Winchesters have found, blind loyalty to Dad or angry rebellion from the family business -- well, those gambits don't necessarily work out the way you want them to.

At some point, you have to stand on your own two feet, not live your life in reaction to someone else's presence or absence, begin making your own choices and living with the consequences. What the angels need is not for God to give Lucifer a time out -- the members of the heavenly host need to grow up and get over what Dad did or didn't do for them.

It'll be interesting to see if the Winchesters can win Gabriel (and maybe Raphael and others) over to their side. I'd imagine they have a shot there. Speight's performance made me think that Gabriel is quite possibly open to the idea of entering the fray. The Trickster is, in a weird way, a moral character. Sure, he can seem amoral and is certainly heedless and selfish, but his antics have often involved trying to teach people a lesson of some kind. Surely the possibility of teaching Satan a lesson -- not to mention taking meaningful action after centuries of goofing off -- could hold some appeal?

CCshades It does seem as if the show is putting pieces in place for quite a big showdown in the second half of the season. So far we've met archangels, Lucifer, New!Meg, the Antichrist and of course there's our old pal Zachariah. We've also seen other hunters in the mix and Bobby and Chuck are of course helping out as well. It'll be interesting to see how the show uses this array of characters as the Apocalyptic endgame arrives later in Season 5.

But what exactly is that endgame? I've been thinking a lot about Season 5 lately, and whether the stakes are -- or can be -- as high as they were in Season 4. 

Of course, the Apocalypse is not a vacation, I get it. But what about the personal stakes between the brothers? That is much of the appeal of the show for me.

The Winchesters' relationship took an interesting turn in Season 4. You never really knew if they were going to stick together or break apart -- and yet you knew how much they loved each other. Their growing conflict was compelling, and what occurred in Season 4 was the culmination of years of miscommunication and suppressed conflict between two people who felt intense loyalty and love but also were growing apart.

This season, the boys did break apart -- for one whole episode. Then they got back together, talked a bit about respecting each other more, and that was pretty much that.

More and more, I'm thinking their quick reunion and their brief "mistakes were made" chats represent a missed opportunity. I would have liked a deeper exploration of the issues that split them apart in the first place, and being apart would have given Sam and Dean a chance to figure out what their strengths and weaknesses as individuals are.

Perhaps pressure from the network or fear of a fan backlash over splitting the boys up for more than one episode led to the quick reunion. And I fully admit that it might have been hard to pull off multiple episodes without the show's leads working together.

(Also, if we're comparing seasons, Season 4 introduced Castiel, which was a great move, and it also had the mystery regarding the exact nature of Dean's divine mission. Those things really amped up the tension in Season 4, as did the further explorations of the Winchester family mythology.) 

Regarding Season 5, I guess what I'm trying to say is, I feel like the show went from A (the boys with serious trust and anger issues between them, issues that had developed over years) to C (the boys getting along fairly well and working together with little or no friction) without showing me the intervening B (the boys work out the serious problems that came up between them and figure out what growing they need to do as individuals).

CCminibikes Here's some more thinking out loud (and all this is just thinking out loud -- these are not Pronouncements About the Season) regarding the Apocalypse and the issue of Sam and Dean as possible meatsuits for Michael and Lucifer.

Is the latter really a danger -- is it really possible that the boys could end up being occupied by those entities? We know it would kill or irreparably harm them if they said yes to being vessels. And I'm pretty sure the show isn't the show if it's Winchester-free. An episode of Lucifer vs Michael: Ultimate Cage Match might be interesting. A season of it? Not so much.

And besides, for a variety of quite understandable reasons (not least of which is the whole "It'll kill you" thing), the Winchesters seem determined to not let themselves be vesselized. So… how long can the show play out this possible-vessel angle before it starts to seem like an empty threat? 

Maybe there are twists coming that will answer my questions and shift some of these storylines to the next level. I hope so. Because in the past, "Supernatural" has taken huge gambles and the unthinkable has happened. At the start of Season 2, John Winchester died. At the end of Season 3, Dean went to Hell. At the end of Season 4, the boys unleashed the Apocalypse.

Those were "I can't believe they did that!" moments. But what happens with the Apocalypse? Presumably if it goes forward as Lucifer hopes it will and his side wins, all life ceases on Earth. So I guess that would mean no Season 6. But seriously, doesn't the fact that the angels/Winchesters have to win (or they die, presumably) deflate the tension a little bit?

CCmetallicar Now, don't get the impression that my opinions of Season 5 are carved in stone. They are doodled on a napkin at this point. I'm just throwing out some ideas and concerns I have. I'll have to see a lot more of this season before I really decide where Season 5 fits in in the "Supernatural" pantheon. I'm just saying, I still don't know if it'll turn out to be like Season 4, which had a tightly constructed through-line, or like Season 3, which had quite a few outstanding episodes but a major story engine (the whole "We unleashed some demons… who are doing demonic stuff!") that felt pretty amorphous if not vague.

For all I know, the mytharc may take a really epic turn this season (and certainly the Nov. 19 episode looks epic -- for more on that look here). But as we saw with the rather unsatisfying Antichrist outing, even episodes that touch on the larger elements of Season 5 need expert handling.

As I've said, I've been satisfied with the quality of the majority of the episodes week to week. But if they're going to do "well, let's just take care of this problem in this town" stories, they need to be really good -- a la "Curious Case of Dean Winchester" -- if they're going to pass muster. And even if I know the show can't afford epic battles and so forth, I would like to meet a few more of Satan's lieutenant's. Meeting War was a good start in that department.

CCGreys By the way, speaking of standalone episodes, I thought "The Curious Case of Dean Winchester" was an excellent showcase for Jim Beaver, and in my view the episode's take on Bobby's response to his injury was just right. He would be mad as hell and starting to think he's useless as a hunter, therefore useless as a person. I'm glad the show didn't gloss over his response to the cataclysm that affected his life so radically. And any episode that has a quality Dean-Bobby "talking about feelings" scene is going to be a win in my book (and of course I must say that the scenes Jim Beaver and Chad Everett shared were very entertaining as well).

"Curious Case" had some major funny as well ("Killing you is officially on my bucket list!"), and Chad Everett was outstanding as Old!Dean. He got Dean's mannerisms, body language and speech patterns down perfectly. And given that Dean has always been something of a Grumpy Old Man anyway, all the "Dean's an old dude!" jokes were quite amusing. I'd love to see Everett back on the show some day.

CCshades2 Hal Ozsan was terrific as the he-witch -- now there's another character I hope we meet again. If I have one little quibble, it's that we don't know how Sam won the poker game. We're seeing how Sam is becoming even more resourceful and deliberate this season, but it'd be nice to see, in this instance, exactly how he used his smarts to put one over on the he-witch.

OK, on to the commenting rules for this site.

As I've said before, the vast majority of "Supernatural" fans are intelligent, thoughtful, insightful and respectful of my views and the views of their fellow commenters. But some people make me a little crazy.

So before you think about commenting here, keep the following guidelines in mind. And if you can't follow the common-sense guidelines below, you will be banned from commenting on this site.

You won't get a second chance, you won't get a warning.

CCcreatedby Why? Because this site functions according to Mo's Grand Theory of Commenting, which can be summed up as the Lurkers Rule. To wit: The environment here should be so accepting, so calm and so non-screechy that most timid lurker should feel it's safe to comment. I simply won't let angry, vicious, annoying or repetitive people hijack the comment areas.

The upshot? Don't tick me off. I'll ban you. Or turn you into an action figure.

So, here are the common-sense guidelines:
Be nice. To further quote from Alan Sepinwall's Rules for Commenting: "This is an opinion blog, and a place where people can and should argue passionately for their point of view. But there's a difference between arguing with passion and arguing with hostility. If you can't find a way to express your viewpoint without insulting other commenters, or getting strident and self-righteous -- say, equating your opinion with fact, and deriding other people for not seeing the truth of your words -- then either tone down your words until they're more respectful to other people, or don't comment." Read the whole thing. Those rules apply here.    Absolutely no Samgirl-Deangirl fangirl nonsense. I'm not going to explain what this is. We all know what it is. It's possible to critique individual episodes or indeed the creative direction of the show in an intelligent fashion without becoming hysterical about how the writers have ruined Sam, Dean, the show and/or Western Civilization. Alice Jester's post on Sam and Dean, their Infamous Apologies and the nature of family squabbling says it all. As a fan, if you're not coming from the place that Alice is, or someplace in that neighborhood, go elsewhere to rant. No comments over 500 words.Please, please don't mention any spoilers of any kind. Speculation is fine, actual spoilers are not, even little ones.  Enjoy this. I know, everything I wrote above sounds so strict and uptight! And I'm sorry for that (and again, it's aimed at the few people who don't already abide by these guidelines instinctively). But if we can't make this commenting atmosphere enjoyable, then there's no point in doing it.Some other relevant info: I read and approve all comments before they are posted. Comments posted Thursday night won't show up until Friday morning. And since commenting typically continues over the weekend, you may see a lag time between when you post your comment and when you see it appear here.If you see typos, please be kind when you point them out, and I'll clean them up as soon as I can.


KWS bonds people with animal for more cash
Since Usain Bolt, the worldÂ's fastest man, adopted his equivalent in the jungle, a cheetah, the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) has lined up more animals for adoption. The adoption at the Nairobi orphanage and Safari walk is meant to conserve wildlife and diversify KWS revenue base.
Judge stops 2 Web sites from selling Beatles songs
LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has temporarily blocked two music-sharing Web sites from selling songs by The Beatles and other artists for 25 cents apiece.
Come And Play: 'Sesame Street' Celebrates 40 Years

Four decades after its premiere, Sesame Street is the same happy neighborhood it always was. TV critic David Bianculli takes a look at the newest episode — which features special guest Michelle Obama — and assesses the show's enduring legacy.


Kamis, 05 November 2009

Katee Sackhoff and Tricia Helfer stage 'Battlestar' takeover of CBS comedies

Near the end of this post, you'll find a photo of Katee Sackhoff in the Nov. 23 episode of "The Big Bang Theory." If you hadn't heard about her appearance on the fine CBS comedy, here's my story about  Sackhoff's upcoming "Big Bang" visit, as well as my general thoughts about the show's pleasing third season.

TriciaMen

I've put the photo and the episode summary below in case you don't want to see the circumstances of the appearance by Sackhoff, who is most famous for playing Kara "Starbuck" Thrace on "Battlestar Galactica" and is a series regular on the upcoming season of "24."

Her "Big Bang" scene promises to be pretty fun. One of the show's characters is pretty much living the fanboy dream in that episode.

Sackhoff isn't the only "Battlestar" alum to appear on CBS this month: On the Nov. 16 "Two and a Half Men," Tricia Helfer plays Gail, Chelsea's hot college roommate, who comes for a visit after a bad breakup. Charlie (Charlie Sheen) is pretty much like Baltar on "Battlestar": So many hot ladies around make him a little mental. 

Another Helfer photo and the Sackhoff picture are below.

Here is summary of "The Vengeance Formulation," the Nov. 23 episode of "The Big Bang Theory": "After he's humiliated on National Public Radio, Sheldon vows to destroy Kripke, while Wolowitz tries not to destroy his new relationship with Bernadette. "Battlestar Galactica" star Katee Sackhoff appears as herself, offering Wolowitz some relationship advice."

KateeBBT And what an intimate setting Wolowitz and Sackhoff have for their conversation! As "Big Bang Theory" co-creator Chuck Lorre told USA Today, "We should all have a conscience that looks like Katee Sackhoff."

TriciaMen2 CBS does appear to like the "Battlestar" folks. Michael Trucco also appeared on "Big Bang," as did a Cylon toaster recently (check out this post for a funny clip of Sheldon making Cylon toast).

At this rate I'm hoping that Edward James Olmos puts in an appearance at McLaren's, the bar on "How I Met Your Mother." Who's with me?


Ten ways to end the world -- on film
Filmmakers keep finding new and different ways to bring life as we know it to an end.
'Fourth Kind': She Can See Aliens From Her House

In an Alaska town, a series of mysterious disappearances leads a psychologist (Milla Jovovich) to conclude that extraterrestrials have been interfering with the locals. Olatunde Osunsanmi's faux-documentary thriller has its share of effective shocks, says critic Ian Buckwalter, but the truth is, it's kinda out there.


Rabu, 04 November 2009

Got questions for the Watcher? Leave them here

Oprah channel OWN hires another creative executive
The highly anticipated but delayed cable channel OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network will soon have a new chief creative officer -- Lisa Erspamer. But unlike those who have gone before her, this executive has something that others at OWN have lacked: experience working with Winfrey.Lisa Erspamer

Erspamer is currently co-executive producer of Winfrey's daytime talk show, a position she has held since 2006. According to OWN, Erspamer has produced hundreds of episodes of the syndicated show and overseen many memorable moments including this season’s kickoff “flash mob” dance party in the streets of Chicago and the now-famous Oprah car giveaway. Erspamer is a 15-year veteran of Harpo Productions; she joined Winfrey's company in 1994.

She will move from Chicago to Los Angeles in January to join the planned cable channel, a joint venture of Winfrey and Discovery Communications. The owners have yet to announce a launch date for the channel.

“Lisa has been a creative superstar. She’s brought fire and force to many of the incredible shows we’ve done over the years. I value her passion and sensibilities and trust her instincts and judgment. I know she’ll be a great fit with the OWN team,” Winfrey, who is chairwoman of OWN, said in a statement.

She will report to OWN Chief Executive Christina Norman, a former top MTV executive, who was brought in by Tom Freston, the ex-MTV and ex-Viacom chief who is working as an advisor to the channel.

The move appears to signal that Winfrey might be close to announcing an official end date for her syndicated talk show that runs on ABC. Winfrey is under contract to produce the show through May 2011, which will be at the completion of her 25th season. She has not said whether she will extend her run beyond that.

OWN has struggled in its nearly two-year gestation period finding the right executive team. The high-stakes venture has had plenty of behind-the-scenes drama. In the last six months, three top programmers, including OWN's original president, have exited the channel. Norman was hired this year, and in June, OWN named another head of programming, Jamila Hunter, who came from NBC Universal. 

-- Meg James

Photo: Lisa Erspamer. Credit: OWN


Got questions for the Watcher? Leave them here

Quite a few reader queries piled up in my email in-box last week when I was on vacation.

So in a few days I'll be posting a "Mo Answers Your TV-relatedquestions" column. I thought I'd give folks another chance to submitquestions here.

Please make sure they're TV-related. You don't want me giving youlife advice. OK, maybe you do, but not on these here Internets. Thatsort of thing is better done with a wineglass or coffee mug in hand.


The Star Report: Kate Beckinsale sizzles on red carpet; Brad Pitt has a bad beard day
Brad Pitt looks scraggly at "Basterds" premiere in Japan. Kate Beckinsale, Drew Barrymore light up "Everybody's Fine" premiere. Model Julia Henderson reveals a lot in her skimpy dress.
An American Family

By Coburn Dukehart Photographer Pam Spaulding took the concept of the long-term assignment to an extreme — spending more than 30 years photographing the McGarvey family of Anchorage, Ky. Working for the Louisville Courier-Journal, Spaulding orig...


Selasa, 03 November 2009

'The Lacuna,' Kingsolver's Vacant Return

Hollywood's Raleigh Studios plants flag in Budapest

Raleigh Raleigh Studios is building a new studio complex, but you won't be able to get there on the 101. 

The Hollywood-based company, the largest independent studio operator in the United States, runs studios in Hollywood, Manhattan Beach and Louisiana, and now is expanding in a big way into Eastern Europe.

The company is set to open nine sound stages totaling 180,907 square feet on the outskirts of Budapest, Hungary, this spring to take advantage of the country's low-cost labor and film tax credits.

Raleigh, which is owned by commercial developers George and Mark Rosenthal (whose assets include the Sunset Marquis Hotel in Hollywood), is developing the $70-million project with a consortium of Hungarian investors and businessmen called the Origo Film Group. Scheduled to open in April, the complex would be the most ambitious project to date for Raleigh, which already owns or manages nearly 40 stages.

"This is going to be the finest studio on the continent," said Michael Moore, president of Raleigh Studios. "It will be truly run like a Hollywood studio."

Raleigh still maintains significant operations in Los Angeles. The company owns 12 sound stages in Hollywood and manages 14 sound stages in Manhattan Beach, where Marvel Studios has signed a long-term lease to shoot its "Iron Man" films. Nonetheless, the Hungary project underscores how Southern California remains vulnerable to the continued outflow of movies and TV shows to other states and countries that offer more generous incentives to filmmakers than are available in California.

That has forced companies such as Raleigh to go where their customers are going: outside of California.  Raleigh also is building a production studio in Pontiac, Mich., and operates four sound stages in Baton Rouge, La., to capitalize on the rapid film production growth in those states.

By contrast, the Walt Disney Co. announced last week that it would build 12 sound stages at its Golden Oak ranch in the Santa Clarita area. Although many local sound stages have struggled from the falloff in local film and TV production, Disney said it wanted to centralize production of various ABC and cable shows that are currently scattered throughout the region.

"From a supply-and-demand standpoint, it wouldn't make sense for us to add sound stages in Los Angeles,'' said Moore, although he said Raleigh's facilities here are mostly full.

Budapest offered several advantages, he said, citing not only the tax credits, but experienced crews, low costs of filming compared to elsewhere in Europe and the city's diverse architecture, which can double for London, Berlin or Paris.

Although Hungary has a long filmmaking tradition, for many years Hollywood gravitated to other Eastern European locations, primarily Prague, Czech Republic. Now Hungary is enjoying a resurgence in interest from filmmakers, thanks to investment in new studios and a a tax credit that covers up to 25% of production costs, making it one of the most generous in Europe. The credit was introduced in 2004 and expanded last year.

Movies filmed in Hungary this year include Lionsgate's supernatural thriller "Season of the Witch," starring Nicolas Cage;  Miramax's thriller "The Debt," starring Helen Mirren; and Focus Features' Roman drama "The Eagle of the Ninth."

Film tax incentive programs in Europe, Canada and the U.S. have become more attractive to studios as they look to reduce filming costs in the face of declining DVD sales and other economic challenges.

Erzsebet Toth, CEO of the Hungarian Film Commission, said the Raleigh complex would be a "great and welcome addition to the slate of sound stages already in business'' within 20 miles of Budapest,
including the Korda Film Studio, which hosted Universal Pictures' 2008 film "Hellboy II: The Golden Army."

Raleigh Studios Budapest will include a 45,000-square-foot "superstage" that reaches 65 feet high, as well as lighting and other equipment rentals, a post-production facility, 15-acre backlot for outdoor sets and training school for film workers. The studio will be fully integrated with Raleigh's operations in Hollywood.

Moore said he expects the facility will have a high occupancy rate and has several projects lined up, but he declined to identify them.

"We're very confident judging by the level of interest and activity we've seen so far,'' he said.

-Richard Verrier

Photo: Architectural drawing of Raleigh Studios Budapest. Credit: Raleigh Studios.


'V' aliens say they come in peace. Sure! A review of the compelling sci-fi series
Some new shows fly under the radar, but not "V" (7 p.m. Central Tuesday, ABC; three and a half stars).

Of course, those giant alien ships may have something to do with "V's" high profile. (Note: The review that follows does not contain spoilers. The video clip below contains the first 9 minutes of the "V" premiere.)

If you've seen any of the ABC promos for "V," you've probably seen a glimpse of one of those ships hovering over a city, or you may have seen a commercial in which the aliens' alluring spokeswoman says that the folks in those gigantic ships come in peace. They're here to help. Everything's going to be fine.

Sure it is!


Of course, as we all know from decades of sci-fi television and films, alien invasions rarely go well. Yet no matter how many times that scenario goes awry, we can't get enough of that oldie-but-goodie "they're here!" story. And as we saw over the summer with the TV miniseries "Torchwood: Children of Earth" and the film "District 9," in the right hands, it's possible to re-tell that clash-of-species story with verve and relevance.

So is "V" any good? That's a question I've gotten frequently in the past few months. There's a slight edge of fear to the queries, as if people were almost prepared to accept the idea that those who've re-made the 1980s TV series got it all wrong.

(And let's face it, we sci-fi fans are a frequently disappointed lot. ABC hasn't quite managed to quite recapture the magic of "Lost" with any of its subsequent genre-flavored offerings. "FlashForward" still seems like a show that is more about its concept than its characters. And the other notable fall genre offering, Syfy's "Stargate Universe," is a boring, poorly plotted, lamentably sexist mess.)

Re "V," here's the positive news: The pilot for this drama is good. I have a few quibbles with it -- some of the character drama is a bit clunky -- but overall, I found the first hour of the show to be solidly entertaining and suitably suspenseful.

But here's the caveat: I have no idea whether "V" will keep up this level of quality as the show progresses. It's relatively easy to introduce a powerful menace and rachet up the tension about what that mysterious entity might do. It's harder to start doling out answers in a satisfying way, build a compelling mythology and -- most important of all -- create characters whose fate actually matters to the audience.

And despite the show's good pace and the fine performances from actors such as Morena Baccarin ("Firefly") as the smooth-talking alien leader, Joel Gretsch ("The 4400") as a doubting priest, Scott Wolf ("The Nine") as an ambitious journalist and Elizabeth Mitchell ("Lost") as a federal investigator with suspicions about the newcomers, there are a few reasons for concern.

First of all, ABC has given the show an unusual schedule: It will air four episodes during November, then bring the show back in March, after the Olympics. What if "V" doesn't do well this fall and never finishes out its run? Well, first of all, let's not get ahead of ourselves: Even though it has struggled creatively, "FlashForward" is still on the air and doing OK in the ratings. So "V" may do well enough to re-invade our TVs this spring.

But if "V" is canceled, and if we've invested in the show, we'll probably feel like Charlie Brown after Lucy takes the football away (fans of ABC's "Daybreak" will recall that "Foiled again!" feeling). And we'll hope that ABC puts the remaining episodes up on its Web site in a timely fashion.

The other causes for concern don't have me all that worried, but they're worth noting. Production on "V" was shut down for a time so that the writers could fine-tune upcoming scripts. That's a fairly common occurrence, especially for first-year shows, and the break may have given "V" the time it needed to find its feet.

Also, "V" has a new showrunner: Scott Rosenbaum ("The Shield," "Chuck") has taken over that position, a Warner Bros. TV representative confirmed. Writer Jeffrey Bell, who'd been working on "V," is expected to leave, although the previous showrunner and executive producer, Scott Peters ("The 4400") is expected to remain on the "V" staff and write for the show. (USA Today broke the news about Rosenbaum joining "V" Tuesday). I'm a fan of the shows that Rosenbaum worked on previously, so I'm hoping this is good news.

I'm also hoping that the break -- and this is purely speculation on my part -- didn't give nervous executives a chance to meddle creatively and water down the genre aspects of the show. That would be disappointing, to say the least. This is a show about aliens coming to Earth, for goodness' sake. When a drama backs away from the freaky concept at its core -- as "Dollhouse" did it its early days -- it ends up satisfying no one.

Yes, "V" has to be a fairly mainstream character drama in order to work on a broadcast network (and let's hope it is a more subtle one going forward), but to stifle the mythological storytelling or tamp down the political and cultural allegories on the show would hamstring "V" and turn it into just another generic ABC prime-time drama. Nobody needs "What About Brian" with space ships.

Part of the message of "V" is that it can be wrong to blindly place one's trust in any entity or person; handled wrongly, that message could start to feel like an anvil to the skull. But, as some of the show's characters realize, it's also a mistake to make snap judgments based on appearances.

So I'll close by saying that, at first glance, "V" seems quite compelling. But we'll have to wait to see whether the show's intentions and ambitions live up to our expectations.


Tony Hicks: In my dream world, Doogie Howser's my best bud
And so are George Clooney, Brad Pitt and George W. Bush.
'The Lacuna,' Kingsolver's Vacant Return

It's been nine years since Barbara Kingsolver, author of The Poisonwood Bible, has released a new novel — but is The Lacuna worth the wait? Critic Maureen Corrigan says this personalized perspective on the Red Scare in Mexico reflects the hidden meaning of the book's title: vacancy.


CHILE: Women in Arms
SANTIAGO, Nov 3 (IPS)The official version of Chilean history renders women’s political participation "invisible" and relegates them to a secondary or anecdotal role, says journalist Cherie Zalaquett, author of a new book, "Chilenas en armas" (Chilean Women in Arms).

Senin, 02 November 2009

Let's talk 'Mad Men': 'The Grown-Ups'

Big Sunday shows 'This Is It' isn't performing like a concert film

JacksonIt "This Is It" continues to throw all the old rules about concert movies out the window.

Domestic ticket sales for the Michael Jackson movie totaled $8.3 million on Sunday, nearly $2 million more than the $6.3 million Sony Pictures projected Sunday morning and 17% more than the movie grossed on Saturday. The movie's total domestic gross is now $34.4 million, making the worldwide number $103 million.

Concert movies traditionally see ticket sales decline rapidly after they premiere, as avid fans who turn out on opening day make up most of the audience. But "This Is It" grossed more on Sunday than any day since it debuted, a sign that word-of-mouth is strong and moviegoers who initially may have been hesitant are turning out. There also may be repeat viewing, which is often the case for concert films.

If the trend continues, "This Is It" should enjoy a relatively modest decline next weekend, and what initially looked like a middling domestic performance may actually turn into a pretty good one, albeit not nearly as big as overseas. That's where Jackson is really cleaning up.

-- Ben Fritz

Photo: Michael Jackson in "This Is It." Credit: Kevin Mazur


Let's talk 'Mad Men': 'The Grown-Ups'

The following post discusses "The Grown-Ups," Sunday's episode of "Mad Men."

"It felt for a second like everything was about to change." Pete Campbell


So. The calamity we've all been waiting for happened.

Carla Before I get into my reactions to "The Grown-Ups," I first have to praise one of the show's unheralded players. Deborah Lacey has been subtle and terrific as Carla for three seasons now. And her reaction to the death of John F. Kennedy sent chills over my whole body, both times I watched the episode.

We've probably all seen those grainy bits of footage -- or excerpts from them -- quite a few times in our lives. To produce a shocked, horrified reaction to an event that has been part of the fabric of history for so long is indeed a tall order for any television show.

In that brief scene, Carla's reaction is what made the assassination seem fresh and shocking to me. For a character who is so notably restrained, her tears were especially poignant. Kudos to Lacey, who I hope gets even more opportunities than she's gotten this season to do her brilliant and finely nuanced acting.

In some ways, that scene told the story of the episode. The social order was upended -- before that event, Carla would never have sat down on the couch with Betty, let alone pulled out a cigarette and begun smoking. But Betty didn't notice, or care. In that moment, they were both just grieving people and their normal social roles just fell away.

There was a role reversal for the children and the adults as well. The adults were bereft: Sally comforted her mother, instead of the other way around. Throughout the episode, it was clear that Sally and even Bobby were pretty perceptive about what was going on with the adults. They may not have understood the full impact of JFK's death, but Sally understood a lot about her parents' reactions. She's smart enough to know that the grown-ups did not fully have a handle on this tragedy -- and their marriage was pretty fragile too.

The title of the episode was "The Grown-Ups," but to whom did that refer? Much of the episode explored people's varied reactions were to this shattering event. When the world fell apart, who did these people want to be with? Who did they want to talk to? How did it affect their perceptions of their lives? Would it make them take responsibility for themselves -- would they act like grown-ups? Or would they, like children, attempt to retreat into a cocoon of dependence and safety?

MM cronkite It's interesting that the children and the adults were equally dependent on the television. Perhaps it was reassuring that the news anchors themselves were grown-ups. Their voices may have wavered, but these men didn't lose it. They acted as the nation's surrogate fathers as a new media era dawned.  

Speaking of dependence, at the start of the episode, the heating in the Sterling Cooper building wasn't working. It was either too hot or too cold in the offices. I wasn't quite sure what that was about until it occurred to me that the workers in the building were just waiting for someone to take care of it. Somebody would fix the situation, so that, like the porridge in the Goldilocks story, their building would not be too hot or too cold but just right. They just assumed that someone would attend to the problem for them.

But nobody could tell them how to react to JFK's death. And massive tragedies force people to re-evaluate their lives. They make people really look at what's important to them and what isn't. Since the assassination affected everyone a different way, I thought it might be helpful to go through the arcs of a few major characters in this episode:

Don: The shattering event of this episode, for Don, was not the death of JFK. Don has experienced so much pain and tragedy in his life that he's familiar with the trajectory of grief. Sure, he still has a lot of unexpressed pain still bottled up inside him, but he knows that the worst of it eventually passes. It's possible to move on and function.

And all things considered, a bigger bomb may have gone off in his life in last week's episode, when Betty confronted him about his secrets. He survived that terrifying situation, and in fact, after that he was better positioned to move forward with his life in a more positive way.

The events of last week's episode made those final shots of Don in "The Grown-Ups" all the more heartbreaking. He had laid himself bare to her. He had revealed almost everything (as much as he realistically could, and much more than he ever thought he would).

For him to expose himself like that, to be so honest and vulnerable, then to be so utterly rejected by Betty -- that must have been devastating. "I don't love you." That's heart-rending for anyone to hear, but for Don/Dick, who's known so much rejection, it's an unimaginable loss (but one he certainly had a role in bringing about).

Still, you had to feel for the guy. That moment is as awful as anything Don had ever gone through before. He had been trying to be there for his family -- comforting the baby at night, helping with the kids, not out having affairs. He's really, for him, trying his level best and being as good a man as he can be. And it's not enough.

Don Once again -- Jon Hamm, ladies and gentlemen. WOW. As he walked into that bedroom and sat down, he was the very picture of a gutted man. Hollowed out and destroyed. Kudos to the director, who used a funereal color palette in that final scene. Don folds his hands together, almost in prayer. Just like that, Don's dreams of a safe haven have been ripped apart.

The funeral that the endlessly droning TV kept talking about was for the death of a youthful, vigorous president, but what Don felt is the death of his marriage and the death of his wife's feelings for him. That's the tragedy he'll have to deal with.

But he did what Don does. He went to work. The final image of the episode is the famous "back of the head" shot we occasionally get of Don. Alone in his office, drinking. So, so sad, to have the promise of real intimacy with his wife right in front of him, only to have that tantalizing possibility ripped away.

Betty: Believe it or not, I don't blame Betty for what she said to Don. Now, how a woman could see Don Draper and Henry Francis side by side and feel more attracted to the latter -- well, as Tim Gunn would say, "It's a matter of taste."

It took me awhile, but I think I understand why Betty was attracted to the fantasy of a new life with Henry. Don has lied to her, he's deceived her from Day 1. She can't rely on him -- she can't be sure he's not hiding more lies or about to embark on more affairs. Her whole world has shattered -- the well-ordered society that she knew is ending. And Henry offers an escape from the life she has now as well as a refuge of sorts.

Betty He's a way out -- and she needs a way out that accounts for the fact that she needs money and the right kind of mate if she and her children are going to keep their heads above water, socially speaking. She can't just run off, and divorcing Don with no backup plan is a terrifying idea to her.

But there's Henry -- looking for all the world like a kindly father figure. He'll take care of her, he'll treat her like a queen, he'll be the grown-up and she can be the dependent daughter again.

Interestingly enough, both Betty and Pete see that JFK's death marks a huge turning point in society, but they react to that change in very different ways. Pete sees that the era of "every man for himself" has arrived (Trudy agrees that "you don't owe [Sterling Cooper] anything"). Betty also sees that this is a sea change, but she doesn't respond, as Pete does, by growing closer to her spouse and forging a new, more independent path. Realistically speaking, that may not be an option for her. She's a mother of three with no job skills and a husband who has proved unreliable.

But she does want a change, and she doesn't love her husband, a man who doesn't want to change his life. He wants the status quo, with her doing her part as the trophy wife. Betty's just given up on that image, an image and lifestyle that Don is still clinging to fiercely, though his affair with Miss Farrell shows that the changes that are coming do hold some appeal for him.

It'll be interesting to see if this couple really does split up or stay together. And I'm thinking maybe "Mad Men" needs to decide whether they'll stay together or not. Honestly, if the show plays the "Don and Betty may be over for good" card again, it's going to start to get tired.

We've had three seasons now in which the show has threatened to break the couple apart -- but so far they haven't broken up. Looking at the season as a whole, I'd have to say again that there was too much repetitive home-front content for me, especially in the first half of the season.

If we get more of the same home-front stuff in Season 4 -- and we keep seeing the threat of those two possibly breaking up -- it's going to get tiresome. But let's not get ahead of ourselves (and just to be clear, I think the there have been things to like about almost every episode, the second half of the season has been really good and this episode in particular was satisfying and thought-provoking).

Pete: We've seen Pete grow a lot, haven't we? He didn't lose his temper with Lane Pryce, he was quite perceptive about the assassination and peoples' reactions to it and he had several reasoned, thoughtful discussions with his wife about whether to go to the wedding and what to do with his career. Interestingly enough, Pete and Trudy seem to have the most solid marriage on the show. Both acted like grown-ups and recognized that Pete's attendance at the wedding would have been a farce and an unnecessary one at that.

With the united front they're showing, I think Pete could go far. But I do wonder if marketing would really be a better fit for Pete. He dismissed the idea as "a research job," but Pete's perceptive, analytical mind would be a great fit for that kind of position. Plus, in that arena, he'd have to deal less with clients. He has gotten better about refraining from sticking his foot in his mouth, but Ken Cosgrove does seem to be a more natural fit as an accounts man.

(Having said that, I've missed Kenny Cosgrove this season. All in all, I'd have preferred more SC story lines -- more Peggy, more Joan, more from the junior executives, more from Roger and Bert. Ah well. If nothing else, I'd have liked a better sense of why Ken got the job and not Pete. At this point, we just have to take Pryce's word for it that Ken deserved the top job.)

Peggy: Like Don, Peggy retreats to work when things get too overwhelming. And like Don, she's not one to overdo the sentimentality or the emotions of even a big moment; she's a practical woman.  She puts her head down and gets the job done (and that perseverance is going to take her far). She realized the Aquanet campaign needed work, and she realized her mother didn't really need an audience for her shows of grief.

I've no idea what she feels for Duck, maybe not much. At least it appears to be an enjoyable romp -- but will it last beyond that strange moment in time? Who knows. Peggy's a tough one to read sometimes, but it was amusing to see that, when "Mr. Herman" called, Paul Kinsey could read her like a book.

Rogerphone Roger: He seems to have exchanged one demanding daughter for another. And he may be realizing that losing Mona and gaining Jane wasn't such a great deal. She locked herself in a bathroom at one point like a disaffected teenager. And Roger told Bert Cooper to "keep an eye on her," as if she was an 8-year-old child. And Roger was right about Jane's gift to Margaret -- it was too much, and Jane should have consulted him. Instead, Jane acted like a spoiled brat when confronted with her mistake.

Joan I think Roger may have finally realized -- and let me know if you agree or not -- that Joan is "The One." He wanted to talk to her after the assassination -- he could be serious with her and she understood why the event upset him so much. And Joan immediately saw that the jokester Roger had nothing funny to say about this event.

Joan's the only one who really sees behind Roger's light-hearted, cynical facade. Mona may have seen that serious side of him too, but that couple's time had passed. I just love Joan and Roger together, even on the phone. They have a bond that seems so real and unbreakable. But alas, they're both married to others -- people who don't really get them in any essential way. Sigh. 

By the way, I loved that look between Don and Roger at the wedding. It was quite cryptic, but there was the faintest hint that Don was enjoying the fact that this expensive event was so obviously a bust. Roger's bonhomie just about made the Derby Day party work, but even Roger recognized his magic wouldn't enliven this somber wedding.

Perhaps the look was also a recognition that, despite everything, these two operators have some kind of bond, maybe even a shred of sympathy for each other. I don't quite know, I could be reading that glance wrong. But I'm curious about where things will go with Don and Roger. I think a lot of us are hoping they'll band together to take over SC, but, as appears to be the case with Don and Betty, there may be too much history there. Maybe Don and Roger are past the point of making peace with each other.

Some other thoughts on the episode:

*From remarks Matthew Weiner has made, it seemed as though "Mad Men" might deal with the death of JFK in a glancing, elliptical way. Weiner told Alan Sepinwall that he didn't pick 1963 because it would allow him to deal with JFK -- it sounded as though it wasn't necessarily his intent to dwell on it in great detail.

Of course JFK's death is an obvious landmark in that year, but he told Sepinwall that "if we do [deal with the assassination], it's going to be something different." I guess what was surprising about "The Grown-Ups" is that it wasn't really something different. That's not a criticism, just an observation.

"The Grown-Ups" dealt with JFK's death exactly as I would have predicted a show set in 1963 would have -- it took on that event in a big, in-depth way. That event was the catalyst for the entire episode, and the source of its themes of dependence, crisis and the pain of transitions.

So, in a way, the show did surprise me, by doing exactly what I thought it wouldn't do. Just as I thought the show would be true to its sometimes elliptical style and put off Betty confronting Don about the contents of the box, "Mad Men" had Betty confront Don about his secret drawer pretty quickly. The obvious choice was the surprising one, because often "Mad Men" makes the less obvious choice. In any case, I like being surprised, so the intense focus on JFK's death -- that was a surprise.

I thought it would have an impact, but I also thought it would be an offstage event, if you will. But here, it was front and center. That scene between Carla and Betty was telling, as were several other post-assassination moments. But the more I think about it, the more I think Betty seeing Oswald shot on live television was the turning point for her and for the episode. Betty's ideas about how her world worked were blown apart in that moment.

A man who was accused of assassinating the president was shot on live TV as Betty sat there in her bathrobe. "What is going on?" she cried. Don's revelations about his past may have, in that moment, seemed like small potatoes. That information changed Betty's life, but what she was witnessing was changing the world. And that's scary.

The tragedy did play a central role in the episode, but as with the Cuban Missile Crisis, the JFK assassination was used to shed light on the characters' inner lives and motivations. What was most important was how they reacted to this news.

Still, the amount of news footage we saw -- including the famous footage of Walter Cronkite almost losing his composure -- was surprising. It was there, I think, to show us the dawn of the modern media age.

We are all glued to the TV if something awful or huge happens, no matter how much (or how little) sense the talking heads on the box make. We just need those voices to be the grown-ups, to tell us that someone, somewhere, is making sense of the situation. The constant hum of those voices, that constant background chatter -- we hope that, in the aggregate, those voices will somehow reassure us that someone is on top of the situation, that the right information is being gathered, that it'll be OK.

Logically, we know that's a fantasy -- senseless tragedies will always, in some way, be senseless, no matter how many words are spoken on the subject. Yet we turn to the voices, again and again. And I'm sure I'm not the only one to ponder the fact that we now have many more voices speaking 24 hours a day about the news -- yet we feel less reassured than ever.

All that said, Sally may now trust the TV more than she trusts her parents. The adults are lying to her -- her father tells her "nothing" happened when Oswald was shot, and she knows he's not telling the truth. She knows he's shielding her from reality (which is a common and sometims commendable parental instinct).

But from now on, the TV will have a role in American life that it didn't have before -- it'll be the "hearth" that Betty's designer talked about. Harry doesn't know how safe his job is. Our dependence on television has only grown since that awful day in 1963.

*Henry Francis offers to marry Betty -- based on what? He knows she can be a fickle woman who doesn't really know what she wants. And they've only been in each other's presence a few times. In some ways, I just don't get why he'd want to marry her -- that character seems smarter and more jaded than that. But perhaps he sees himself as rescuing Betty, which plays into her fantasy of being rescued. Perhaps both of them, when it comes down to it, are children playing fairy-tale roles. (Note: On further review, I took the word "child-like" out of the second sentence of this item. I do think that's no longer the best adjective to describe Betty, but I would still say that some of her actions lack a certain maturity.)

*The scene of Betty and Henry meeting recalled, for me, Betty's parking-lot talk with Glen in an earlier season. She's matured some from that moment, but as her rescue-fantasy indicates, not all that much. I feel she still has a lot of heartbreak ahead of her; her road will not get easier, I predict.

*At least in that car scene, we got a real, big smile from Betty. They're so rare that I can't remember the last time she smiled like that.

*When Don kisses Betty on the dance floor, he has that "Dick Whitman" look of utter sincerity on his face. Really? That does nothing for her?

*There was at least one Roger zinger, when he urged the paltry number of wedding guests to eat both the prime rib and the fillet of sole. Goodness knows it was a horrible wedding reception, but nobody would go away hungry.

*I was glad there was a reference to Sal Romano. I want him back on the show!

*A couple of housekeeping notes: Sorry this post is up late. I didn't get home from a trip out of town until late Sunday and wrote this post Monday morning. I did enjoy my vacation, thanks! As always, please feel free to (kindly) point out any typos you see. Thanks in advance.

*Also, next week's post won't go up until Monday morning. Weiner is not sending that episode out to critics in advance, so I'll spend Sunday night watching the Season 3 finale twice and writing my thoughts. I hope to have that post up by noon Monday.

Sponsored Link: Amazon's Mad Men Store


The Star Report: Oprah, Will Smith, Mariah Carey at 'Precious' premiere
The hard-hitting drama "Precious" brings out the stars to the premiere, including Will Smith, Oprah, Mariah Carey and many others.
In 'Broncos,' An Atypical Hollywood Team Rides Again

Jared and Jerusha Hess, the Utah couple behind the quirky cult film Napoleon Dynamite, are back with a new comedy. Gentlemen Broncos centers on a home-schooled teen and the famous author who steals his sci-fi story; in some ways, Jared Hess says, it's a tribute to his early work.


Minggu, 01 November 2009

'This Is It' on its way to $200 million-plus, thanks mainly to foreigners

"This Is It" poster He's huge in Japan.

Michael Jackson's swan song "This Is It" made up for a so-so start domestically by doing more than twice as much business overseas.

The movie sold $32.5 million over its first five days in the U.S. and Canada and $68.5 million in 97 other countries. It stands with "Angels and Demons" and "Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs" as one of a handful of films that more than doubled its domestic opening in foreign countries.

Japan, where Jackson is particularly huge, was the highest-grossing territory. "This Is It" collected $10.4 million there, making it the third-biggest opening of the year. Britain, where Jackson's "This Is It" concert was scheduled to play, was No. 2, with $7.4 million, followed by Germany, France, Australia and China.

That's particularly good for Sony Pictures because movies often decline slower overseas than domestically. The movie's foreign opening was right in line with expectations going into the weekend, but the five-day domestic take of $32.5 million was at the bottom of what the studio and others in Hollywood thought was possible based on initial hype and pre-release surveys.

Everywhere it played, the best news for "This Is It" is that it didn't fall dramatically after a so-so start on Wednesday. Although many similar concert movies open big and fizzle fast, the Jackson film had a solid weekend compared with its Wednesday grosses. Domestic ticket sales were down less than 10% on Saturday, better than many in Hollywood had expected on Halloween and a sign of positive buzz.

Now that Sony has, in a not-too-surprising move, extended the movie beyond a previously announced two-week run, the film will almost certainly gross more than $200 million worldwide. That would be a healthy performance given Sony's investment of $60 million for the rights to make the movie, plus a relatively modest marketing spend.

There were no other new pictures in wide release as most studios avoided the weekend with Halloween on a Saturday. Sony was forced to take the date as it wanted to launch the film as quickly as possible after Jackson's unexpected death and every other fall weekend was crowded with big releases.

Boondock Saints II In limited release, however, Apparition debuted "The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day" to a solid $461,614 at 68 theaters. That's more than 15 times as much as the ultra-violent original, an infamous flop in 2000 that found renewed life on DVD.

Interest in the filmmakers behind "Napoleon Dynamite" seems to be fading, however, as their new picture, "Gentlemen Broncos," debuted to a dismal $10,000 at two locations.

Most movies already in the market experienced hefty declines because of Halloween, but "Paranormal Activity" and "Amelia" both held on particularly well, thanks in part to added theaters.

Here are the top 10 movies at the domestic box office according to studio estimates and Hollywood.com:

1. "This Is It" (Sony): $21.3 million over the weekend, bringing its total since debuting late Tuesday to $32.5 million. Foreign grosses, meanwhile, have hit $68.5 million.

2. "Paranormal Activity" (Paramount): $16.5 million, down 22% as it added 459 theaters. U.S. and Canadian ticket sales to date are $84.8 million.

3. "Law Abiding Citizen" (Overture/Film Department): Declined 41% on its third weekend to $7.3 million, bringing its total to $51.4 million.

4. "Couples Retreat" (Universal/Relativity): $6.1 million, marking a drop of 43% on its fourth weekend. Domestic total: $88.7 million.

5. "Saw VI" (Lionsgate): Fell 61% on its second weekend to $5.6 million. U.S. and Canadian ticket sales to date are $22.8 million.

6. "Where the Wild Things Are" (Warner Bros./Village Roadshow/Legendary): $5.1 million, down 64% on its third weekend. Its total is now $61.8 million.

7. "The Stepfather" (Sony Screen Gems): $3.4 million, with a third weekend decline of 45%. $24.7 million to date.

8. "Astro Boy" (Summit/Imagi): Fell 55% on its second weekend to $3 million. Ticket sales so far total $10.9 million.

9. "Amelia" (Fox Searchlight): $3 million, down only 23% as it added 250 theaters on its second weekend. $8.3 million in grosses to date.

10. "Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant" (Universal/Relativity): Fell 55% on its second weekend to $2.8 million, bringing total domestic ticket sales to $10.5 million.

-- Ben Fritz

Top photo: A "This Is It" poster. Credit: Sony Pictures.

Bottom photo: Norman Reedus and Sean Patrick Flanery in "The Boondock Saints II: All Saints Day." Credit: Apparition.


Second mummy, of an Egyptian priest named Irethorrou, gets its own San Francisco museum show
After getting a 'physical' via high-resolution CT scans at Stanford University's Medical School, Irethorrou's 5-foot, 4-inch mummy, has become the star attraction in a new show at the Legion of Honor in San Francisco.
For Foer, Meat Is Murder ... And Worse

Author Jonathan Safran Foer grapples with the morality of meat and the brutality of the factory farm system in his new book, Eating Animals. The book is part memoir and part investigative report.